Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
J Gen Physiol
2018 Sep 03;1509:1261-1271. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201711935.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
All four subunits of HCN2 channels contribute to the activation gating in an additive but intricate manner.
Sunkara MR
,
Schwabe T
,
Ehrlich G
,
Kusch J
,
Benndorf K
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-modulated (HCN) channels are tetramers that elicit electrical rhythmicity in specialized brain neurons and cardiomyocytes. The channels are dually activated by voltage and binding of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) to their four cyclic nucleotide-binding domains (CNBDs). Here we analyze the effects of cAMP binding to different concatemers of HCN2 channel subunits, each having a defined number of functional CNBDs. We show that each liganded CNBD promotes channel activation in an additive manner and that, in the special case of two functional CNBDs, functionality does not depend on the arrangement of the subunits. Correspondingly, the reverse process of deactivation is slowed by progressive liganding, but only if four and three ligands as well as two ligands in trans position (opposite to each other) are bound. In contrast, two ligands bound in cis positions (adjacent to each other) and a single bound ligand do not affect channel deactivation. These results support an activation mechanism in which each single liganded CNBD causes a turning momentum on the tetrameric ring-like structure formed by all four CNBDs and that at least two liganded subunits in trans positions are required to maintain activation.
Figure 1. Series of representative currents generated by the wwww concatemer for recording steady-state activation. The pulse protocol is shown above the traces. The channels were activated in the sequence to more hyperpolarizing voltages. The amplitude of the tail current at â100 mV was evaluated.
Figure 2. Function of concatenated homotetrameric channels. (A) Steady-state activation relationships in the absence and presence of 50 µM cAMP for w4 channels. The data points were fitted with Eq. 1, yielding for the parameters Vh and zδ â116.5 ± 1.8 mV (n = 10) and 6.57 ± 0.40 (n = 10); â94.8 ± 1.5 mV (n = 9) and 6.42 ± 0.48 (n = 9), respectively. (B) Same as A for wwww channels. The respective parameters for Vh and zδ are â123.9 ± 2.3 mV (n = 17) and 6.41 ± 0.26 (n = 17); â103.9 ± 3.0 mV (n = 12) and 6.43 ± 0.26 (n = 12). (C) Comparison of the Vh values for the three wild-type and three mutated channels; 0 cAMP (control), black squares, 50 µM cAMP, green squares. (D) Comparison of the cAMP-induced voltage shift of Vh, ÎVh. (E) Comparison of zδ. Symbols correspond to C. (F) Comparison of cAMP-evoked current increase, ÎIâ150mV. 4â17 recordings per data point were included for analyses in C to F. In the cartoons here and below, green circles represent functional binding sites, whereas empty crossed circles represent mutated binding sites. Error bars indicate SEM.
Figure 3. Effect of different combinations of liganded subunits on steady-state activation. Eight tetrameric and one dimeric concatemer are compared. cAMP is applied at a saturating concentration of 50 µM. (A) cAMP-induced voltage shift ÎVh (mV), determined as described for Fig. 2A by using Eq. 1. The amount of voltage shift by liganded subunits is additive. In channels with two functional CNBDs, the cis and the trans position are indistinguishable. (B) Effect of saturating cAMP on current increase at the saturating voltage of â150 mV, ÎIâ150mV. Two liganded subunits suffice to generate the maximum effect. Data points contain 8â17 recordings. Error bars indicate SEM.
Figure 4. Effects of subunit liganding on activation kinetics. (A) Superimposition of activation time courses in the presence and in the absence of cAMP at â140 mV for wwww and illustration of determining the activation time constant Ïa (monoexponential fits are shown in red). Late currents are normalized. (B) Voltage dependence of Ïa and effect of cAMP for wwww (n = 13â17 recordings per data point). Green and black symbols show values obtained at 50 µM and zero cAMP, respectively. (C) Comparison of Ïa for the eight tetrameric concatemers and the dimeric concatemer wm2 at hyperpolarization to â140 mV. Data points contain 9â17 recordings. (D) Ïa values in dependence on normalized voltage. Shown are individual data points. Green and black symbols show values obtained at 50 µM and zero cAMP, respectively. Normalization was performed by the respective Vh value of the individual recordings. Error bars indicate SEM.
Figure 5. Effects of subunit liganding on deactivation kinetics. The currents were activated by pulses of 6-s duration to â140 mV, and deactivation was measured at a subsequent pulse to â30 mV. (A) Superimposition of two current time courses of the concatemer wwww in the absence and presence of cAMP and expanded deactivation time courses at â30 mV. Determination of the time of half-maximum deactivation thd is illustrated. (B) Comparison of Ïd,cAMP/Ïd,cont for the eight tetrameric concatemers and the dimeric concatemer wm2 (see text). At least two liganded subunits in trans position are required to decelerate deactivation. Data points contain 3â32 recordings. Error bars indicate SEM.
Figure 6. Cartoon model for the energetics of activation by voltage and cAMP in a HCN2 channel. A channel is assumed to adopt only one open (O) and one closed (C) state. According to the Eyring rate theory (Glasstone et al., 1941), the transition between the two states requires an amount of free energy ÎG to reach the activation energy Ea of the transition state TS. The major effect on activation is that of voltage (thick red arrows): At â30 mV, ÎG is much higher in O than in C, whereas at â140 mV, ÎG is moderately higher in C than in O. The binding of cAMP to the four subunits (green circles) is assumed to increase and decrease ÎG in the closed and open state, respectively. In the closed state, the energy contributions for the four binding steps are additive, whereas in the open state, these energy contributions are only additive for the quadruple, triple, and trans-double ligated channel and the cis-double and the single ligated channel do not change ÎG with respect to the empty channel.
Altomare,
Integrated allosteric model of voltage gating of HCN channels.
2001, Pubmed
Altomare,
Integrated allosteric model of voltage gating of HCN channels.
2001,
Pubmed
Banks,
Hyperpolarization-activated cation current (Ih) in neurons of the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body: voltage-clamp analysis and enhancement by norepinephrine and cAMP suggest a modulatory mechanism in the auditory brain stem.
1993,
Pubmed
Benndorf,
Unraveling subunit cooperativity in homotetrameric HCN2 channels.
2012,
Pubmed
Benndorf,
Probability fluxes and transition paths in a Markovian model describing complex subunit cooperativity in HCN2 channels.
2012,
Pubmed
Biel,
Hyperpolarization-activated cation channels: from genes to function.
2009,
Pubmed
Biskup,
Relating ligand binding to activation gating in CNGA2 channels.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Brown,
How does adrenaline accelerate the heart?
1979,
Pubmed
Bruening-Wright,
Kinetic relationship between the voltage sensor and the activation gate in spHCN channels.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Chan,
HCN2 and HCN1 channels govern the regularity of autonomous pacemaking and synaptic resetting in globus pallidus neurons.
2004,
Pubmed
Chen,
The S4-S5 linker couples voltage sensing and activation of pacemaker channels.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Chen,
Voltage sensor movement and cAMP binding allosterically regulate an inherently voltage-independent closed-open transition in HCN channels.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Chen,
Properties of hyperpolarization-activated pacemaker current defined by coassembly of HCN1 and HCN2 subunits and basal modulation by cyclic nucleotide.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Chow,
Energetics of cyclic AMP binding to HCN channel C terminus reveal negative cooperativity.
2012,
Pubmed
Clapham,
Not so funny anymore: pacing channels are cloned.
1998,
Pubmed
Craven,
CNG and HCN channels: two peas, one pod.
2006,
Pubmed
Cuttle,
Modulation of a presynaptic hyperpolarization-activated cationic current (I(h)) at an excitatory synaptic terminal in the rat auditory brainstem.
2001,
Pubmed
DiFrancesco,
Dual allosteric modulation of pacemaker (f) channels by cAMP and voltage in rabbit SA node.
1999,
Pubmed
DiFrancesco,
Characterization of single pacemaker channels in cardiac sino-atrial node cells.
,
Pubmed
DiFrancesco,
Characterization of the pace-maker current kinetics in calf Purkinje fibres.
1984,
Pubmed
Elinder,
Mode shifts in the voltage gating of the mouse and human HCN2 and HCN4 channels.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Gauss,
Molecular identification of a hyperpolarization-activated channel in sea urchin sperm.
1998,
Pubmed
Gauss,
Pacemaker oscillations in heart and brain: a key role for hyperpolarization-activated cation channels.
2000,
Pubmed
Goldschen-Ohm,
Structure and dynamics underlying elementary ligand binding events in human pacemaking channels.
2016,
Pubmed
Hayoz,
Investigating cyclic nucleotide and cyclic dinucleotide binding to HCN channels by surface plasmon resonance.
2017,
Pubmed
Hummert,
Activation gating in HCN2 channels.
2018,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ingram,
Modulation of the hyperpolarization-activated current (Ih) by cyclic nucleotides in guinea-pig primary afferent neurons.
1996,
Pubmed
Ishii,
Determinants of activation kinetics in mammalian hyperpolarization-activated cation channels.
2001,
Pubmed
Kaupp,
Molecular diversity of pacemaker ion channels.
2001,
Pubmed
Kusch,
Interdependence of receptor activation and ligand binding in HCN2 pacemaker channels.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kusch,
How subunits cooperate in cAMP-induced activation of homotetrameric HCN2 channels.
2011,
Pubmed
Kwan,
Structural changes during HCN channel gating defined by high affinity metal bridges.
2012,
Pubmed
Lee,
Structures of the Human HCN1 Hyperpolarization-Activated Channel.
2017,
Pubmed
Lolicato,
Tetramerization dynamics of C-terminal domain underlies isoform-specific cAMP gating in hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ludwig,
A family of hyperpolarization-activated mammalian cation channels.
1998,
Pubmed
Ludwig,
Two pacemaker channels from human heart with profoundly different activation kinetics.
1999,
Pubmed
Macri,
Alanine scanning of the S6 segment reveals a unique and cAMP-sensitive association between the pore and voltage-dependent opening in HCN channels.
2009,
Pubmed
Männikkö,
Hysteresis in the voltage dependence of HCN channels: conversion between two modes affects pacemaker properties.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Moosmang,
Cellular expression and functional characterization of four hyperpolarization-activated pacemaker channels in cardiac and neuronal tissues.
2001,
Pubmed
Ng,
Cyclic Purine and Pyrimidine Nucleotides Bind to the HCN2 Ion Channel and Variably Promote C-Terminal Domain Interactions and Opening.
2016,
Pubmed
Notomi,
Immunohistochemical localization of Ih channel subunits, HCN1-4, in the rat brain.
2004,
Pubmed
Pian,
Regulation of gating and rundown of HCN hyperpolarization-activated channels by exogenous and endogenous PIP2.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Robinson,
Hyperpolarization-activated cation currents: from molecules to physiological function.
2003,
Pubmed
Rothberg,
Voltage-controlled gating at the intracellular entrance to a hyperpolarization-activated cation channel.
2002,
Pubmed
Ryu,
Charge movement in gating-locked HCN channels reveals weak coupling of voltage sensors and gate.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Saitow,
Excitability increase induced by beta-adrenergic receptor-mediated activation of hyperpolarization-activated cation channels in rat cerebellar basket cells.
2000,
Pubmed
Santoro,
The HCN gene family: molecular basis of the hyperpolarization-activated pacemaker channels.
1999,
Pubmed
Santoro,
Identification of a gene encoding a hyperpolarization-activated pacemaker channel of brain.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Santoro,
Molecular and functional heterogeneity of hyperpolarization-activated pacemaker channels in the mouse CNS.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Santoro,
Interactive cloning with the SH3 domain of N-src identifies a new brain specific ion channel protein, with homology to eag and cyclic nucleotide-gated channels.
1997,
Pubmed
Seifert,
Molecular characterization of a slowly gating human hyperpolarization-activated channel predominantly expressed in thalamus, heart, and testis.
1999,
Pubmed
Shin,
Blocker state dependence and trapping in hyperpolarization-activated cation channels: evidence for an intracellular activation gate.
2001,
Pubmed
Shin,
Inactivation in HCN channels results from reclosure of the activation gate: desensitization to voltage.
2004,
Pubmed
Stieber,
Functional expression of the human HCN3 channel.
2005,
Pubmed
Thon,
Conformational Flip of Nonactivated HCN2 Channel Subunits Evoked by Cyclic Nucleotides.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Thon,
Elementary functional properties of single HCN2 channels.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ulens,
Regulation of hyperpolarization-activated HCN channels by cAMP through a gating switch in binding domain symmetry.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wainger,
Molecular mechanism of cAMP modulation of HCN pacemaker channels.
2001,
Pubmed
Wang,
Activity-dependent regulation of HCN pacemaker channels by cyclic AMP: signaling through dynamic allosteric coupling.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wang,
Regulation of hyperpolarization-activated HCN channel gating and cAMP modulation due to interactions of COOH terminus and core transmembrane regions.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Xu,
Structural basis for the cAMP-dependent gating in the human HCN4 channel.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Zagotta,
Structural basis for modulation and agonist specificity of HCN pacemaker channels.
2003,
Pubmed
Zhou,
Gating of HCN channels by cyclic nucleotides: residue contacts that underlie ligand binding, selectivity, and efficacy.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase