XB-ART-56516
Cell Rep
2019 Apr 23;274:1165-1175.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.098.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Modular Architecture of the STING C-Terminal Tail Allows Interferon and NF-κB Signaling Adaptation.
de Oliveira Mann CC
,
Orzalli MH
,
King DS
,
Kagan JC
,
Lee ASY
,
Kranzusch PJ
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Stimulator of interferon genes (STING) is a key regulator of type I interferon and pro-inflammatory responses during infection, cellular stress, and cancer. Here, we reveal a mechanism for how STING balances activation of IRF3- and NF-κB-dependent transcription and discover that acquisition of discrete signaling modules in the vertebrate STING C-terminal tail (CTT) shapes downstream immunity. As a defining example, we identify a motif appended to the CTT of zebrafish STING that inverts the typical vertebrate signaling response and results in dramatic NF-κB activation and weak IRF3-interferon signaling. We determine a co-crystal structure that explains how this CTT sequence recruits TRAF6 as a new binding partner and demonstrate that the minimal motif is sufficient to reprogram human STING and immune activation in macrophage cells. Together, our results define the STING CTT as a linear signaling hub that can acquire modular motifs to readily adapt downstream immunity.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 31018131
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC7733315
???displayArticle.link??? Cell Rep
Species referenced: Xenopus
Genes referenced: elavl2 irf3 nos2 sting1 tbk1 traf6
GO keywords: inflammatory response [+]
regulation of type I interferon-mediated signaling pathway
positive regulation of innate immunity memory response
???attribute.lit??? ???displayArticles.show???
![]() |
Figure 1STING C-Terminal Modules Control the Balance of Downstream IRF3 and NF-κB Signaling (A) Reconstitution of the cGAS-STING pathway in human cells using a phylogenetically diverse panel of vertebrate STING alleles. Luciferase reporters were used to monitor cGAS-STING dependent interferon β (IFNβ; blue) and NF-κB (orange) responses. Species shown are as follows: 1, human (Homo sapiens); 2, marmoset (Callithrix jacchus); 3, mouse (Mus musculus); 4, cat (Felis catus); 5, seal (Leptonychotes weddellii); 6, cattle (Bos taurus); 7, boar (Sus scrofa); 8, bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus); 9, manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris); 10, Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii); 11, ostrich (Struthio camelus australis); 12, crested ibis (Nipponia nippon); 13, lizard (Anolis carolinensis); 14, turtle (Chelonia mydas); 15, western clawed frog (Xenopus tropicalis); 16, African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis); 17, coelacanth (Latimeria chalumnae); 18, salmon (Salmo salar); 19, zebrafish (Danio rerio); and 20, ghost shark (Callorhinchus milii). (B) Schematics of STING domain organization (TM, transmembrane domain; CDN, cyclic dinucleotide binding domain; CTT, C-terminal tail). Cellular reporter assay as in (A), mapping the motif responsible for enhanced NF-κB signaling to the CTT of zebrafish STING. (C) Cellular reporter assay and schematics as in (B), comparing downstream signaling outputs of human STING with human STING containing the zebrafish STING CTT sequence. The zebrafish STING CTT is sufficient to enhance NF-κB signaling. Cellular reporter assay data are representative of at least three independent experiments. Data are plotted with error bars representing the SD of the mean. |
![]() |
Figure 2. The Zebrafish STING Contains a Unique CTT Module that Boosts NF-κB Signaling(A) Schematics of STING chimera CTT constructs and sequences of human STING T356-S379 and zebrafish STING P363-N398 aligned using Jalview and with three highlighted signaling motifs mapped for type I interferon (dark and light blue) and NF-κB (orange). The human STING residues S366 and L374 required for interferon signaling are marked in red.(B) Reconstitution of the cGAS-STING pathway in human cells using different human-zebrafish STING chimera constructs. Interferon (blue) and NF-κB (orange) reporter activity was measured as in Figure 1A. All STING CTT chimeras consist of a human core domain with three variable CTT modules (dark blue, light blue, and orange) from human and zebrafish STING, respectively (constructs CTT-a to CTT-o).Cellular reporter assay data are representative of at least three independent experiments. Data are plotted with error bars representing the SD of the mean. |
![]() |
Figure 3. The Zebrafish STING CTT Module Directly Recruits TRAF6 to Activate NF-κB Signaling(A) Schematics of zebrafish STING and sequence logo of the highlighted STING CTT signaling factor recruitment motifs of mammals compared with ray-finned fish species (9 amino acids [aa]; 6 aa for interferon signaling and an additional 7 aa in ray-finned fish for NF-κB signaling). Amino acids are numbered according to the human STING sequence.(B) Reporter assay for IFNβ (blue) or NF-κB (orange) using human and zebrafish STING in TBK1 knockout (KO) HEK293T cells. IFNβ signaling is lost in TBK1 KO cells. However, the NF-κB signaling responses for human and zebrafish STING persist in TBK1 KO cells.(C) Reporter assay as in (B), performed in TRAF6 KO HEK293T cells. All zebrafish STING-dependent NF-κB signaling is abolished in TRAF6 KO cells.(D) Reporter assay as in (B), performing alanine scan mutagenesis of the TRAF6 binding motif in the zebrafish STING CTT chimera containing a human STING core domain. Consistent with other TRAF6 recruitment motifs, only the P0 position is essential for STING-TRAF6 complex formation.(E) Cellular assay as in (B), monitoring STING-dependent signaling in the presence of alternative TRAF6 alleles. Endogenous TRAF6 was removed (TRAF6 KO), and signaling was reconstituted with plasmids encoding alternative TRAF6 and TRAF3 alleles as indicated. Disruption of the TRAF6 E3 ligase domain (L74H) or expression of only the TRAF domain prevents zebrafish STING-dependent NF-κB signaling.Cellular reporter assay data are representative of at least three independent experiments. Data are plotted with error bars representing the SD of the mean. |
![]() |
Figure 4. Structural Basis of Zebrafish STING-TRAF6 Complex Formation(A) Schematics of zebrafish TRAF6 domain organization (RING domain, zinc fingers, coiled coil [CC], and TRAF domain) and the co-crystal structure of the zebrafish TRAF6 C-domain (light gray) in complex with the zebrafish STING CTT NF-κB motif (orange) at 1.4à . The STING CTT peptide 2FoâFc electron density is shown in gray and contoured at 1.0 Ï.(B) Interaction map showing the interface between TRAF6 and the zebrafish STING CTT peptide. Main-chain hydrogen bonds between the STING CTT (orange) and the TRAF6 β7 residues (light gray) are shown as dotted lines.(C) Comparison of TRAF6 (light gray) interactions with aromatic or acidic residues at peptide position P3 (orange). STING has an acidic D383 at position P3 that is recognized by an arginine residue at the bottom of the pocket (human TRAF6 R466, zebrafish TRAF6 R487), whereas RANK (PDB: 1LB5) has an aromatic residue, Y349, at the same position that interacts with a distinct arginine at the top of the pocket (human TRAF6 R392, zebrafish TRAF6 R416). |
![]() |
Figure 5. Acquisition of the STING TRAF6 Module Remodels Downstream Immune Responses(A) Schematic representing generation of mouse macrophage cell lines with different STING gene alleles.(B) Western blot analysis of STING expression in different mouse macrophage cell lines compared with the RPS19 loading control. Data are representative of three biological experiments.(C) Heatmap of reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (RPKM) of 100 differentially upregulated genes in mouse macrophage cell lines: control, mouse STING (mSTING) ÎCTT, mSTING, and mSTING zebrafish C-terminal tail (zfCTT). Acquisition of the zebrafish STING CTT enhances the STING-dependent interferon response and additionally activates alternative NF-κB responses.(D) Venn diagram depicting upregulated genes, the normal mouse STING response, and the alternative mSTING zfCTT response.(E) Visualization of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) gene coverage and transcript levels for the selected differentially expressed genes Ifnb, Il12b, nos2, and ccl12 in macrophage cell lines: control, mSTING ÎCTT, mSTING, and mSTING zfCTT using an integrative genomics viewer (IGV) (Robinson et al., 2011).(F) Transcript-level analysis of selected genes by qRT-PCR. qRT-PCR data are representative of three independent experiments.Data are plotted with error bars representing the SD of the mean. |
References [+] :
Abe,
Cytosolic-DNA-mediated, STING-dependent proinflammatory gene induction necessitates canonical NF-κB activation through TBK1.
2014, Pubmed
Abe, Cytosolic-DNA-mediated, STING-dependent proinflammatory gene induction necessitates canonical NF-κB activation through TBK1. 2014, Pubmed
Abe, STING recognition of cytoplasmic DNA instigates cellular defense. 2013, Pubmed
Adams, PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. 2010, Pubmed
Arezi, Novel mutations in Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus reverse transcriptase increase thermostability through tighter binding to template-primer. 2009, Pubmed
Baud, Signaling by proinflammatory cytokines: oligomerization of TRAF2 and TRAF6 is sufficient for JNK and IKK activation and target gene induction via an amino-terminal effector domain. 1999, Pubmed
Cavlar, Species-specific detection of the antiviral small-molecule compound CMA by STING. 2013, Pubmed
Corrales, Direct Activation of STING in the Tumor Microenvironment Leads to Potent and Systemic Tumor Regression and Immunity. 2015, Pubmed
Darnay, Activation of NF-kappaB by RANK requires tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) 6 and NF-kappaB-inducing kinase. Identification of a novel TRAF6 interaction motif. 1999, Pubmed
David, Assembly mechanism of the CARMA1-BCL10-MALT1-TRAF6 signalosome. 2018, Pubmed
Dunphy, Non-canonical Activation of the DNA Sensing Adaptor STING by ATM and IFI16 Mediates NF-κB Signaling after Nuclear DNA Damage. 2018, Pubmed
Emsley, Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. 2004, Pubmed
Fang, NEMO-IKKβ Are Essential for IRF3 and NF-κB Activation in the cGAS-STING Pathway. 2017, Pubmed
Fitzgerald, IKKepsilon and TBK1 are essential components of the IRF3 signaling pathway. 2003, Pubmed
Fu, STING agonist formulated cancer vaccines can cure established tumors resistant to PD-1 blockade. 2015, Pubmed
Gao, Structure-function analysis of STING activation by c[G(2',5')pA(3',5')p] and targeting by antiviral DMXAA. 2013, Pubmed
Goto, The Kinase IKKβ Regulates a STING- and NF-κB-Dependent Antiviral Response Pathway in Drosophila. 2018, Pubmed
Gulen, Signalling strength determines proapoptotic functions of STING. 2017, Pubmed
Haag, Targeting STING with covalent small-molecule inhibitors. 2018, Pubmed
Han, Dendritic cell expression of the signaling molecule TRAF6 is required for immune tolerance in the lung. 2017, Pubmed
Hu, Oligomerization-primed coiled-coil domain interaction with Ubc13 confers processivity to TRAF6 ubiquitin ligase activity. 2017, Pubmed
Huang, The structural basis for the sensing and binding of cyclic di-GMP by STING. 2012, Pubmed
Ishikawa, STING is an endoplasmic reticulum adaptor that facilitates innate immune signalling. 2008, Pubmed
Kabsch, XDS. 2010, Pubmed
Kim, HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. 2015, Pubmed
Kranzusch, Structure of human cGAS reveals a conserved family of second-messenger enzymes in innate immunity. 2013, Pubmed
Kranzusch, Ancient Origin of cGAS-STING Reveals Mechanism of Universal 2',3' cGAMP Signaling. 2015, Pubmed
Lee, eIF3 targets cell-proliferation messenger RNAs for translational activation or repression. 2015, Pubmed
Lin, Helical assembly in the MyD88-IRAK4-IRAK2 complex in TLR/IL-1R signalling. 2010, Pubmed
Liu, MAVS recruits multiple ubiquitin E3 ligases to activate antiviral signaling cascades. 2013, Pubmed
Liu, Phosphorylation of innate immune adaptor proteins MAVS, STING, and TRIF induces IRF3 activation. 2015, Pubmed
Liu, Inflammation-Induced, STING-Dependent Autophagy Restricts Zika Virus Infection in the Drosophila Brain. 2018, Pubmed
Love, Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. 2014, Pubmed
Margolis, Evolutionary Origins of cGAS-STING Signaling. 2017, Pubmed
Martin, Analysis of Drosophila STING Reveals an Evolutionarily Conserved Antimicrobial Function. 2018, Pubmed
Mason, TRAF6-dependent mitogen-activated protein kinase activation differentially regulates the production of interleukin-12 by macrophages in response to Toxoplasma gondii. 2004, Pubmed
McWhirter, Crystallographic analysis of CD40 recognition and signaling by human TRAF2. 1999, Pubmed
Ouyang, Structural analysis of the STING adaptor protein reveals a hydrophobic dimer interface and mode of cyclic di-GMP binding. 2012, Pubmed
Park, Structural basis for self-association and receptor recognition of human TRAF2. 1999, Pubmed
Pullen, CD40-tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) interactions: regulation of CD40 signaling through multiple TRAF binding sites and TRAF hetero-oligomerization. 1998, Pubmed
Robinson, Integrative genomics viewer. 2011, Pubmed
Scumpia, Opposing roles of Toll-like receptor and cytosolic DNA-STING signaling pathways for Staphylococcus aureus cutaneous host defense. 2017, Pubmed
Shang, Crystal structures of STING protein reveal basis for recognition of cyclic di-GMP. 2012, Pubmed
Shi, Molecular basis for the specific recognition of the metazoan cyclic GMP-AMP by the innate immune adaptor protein STING. 2015, Pubmed
Shi, Structural Insights into mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS)-tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) signaling. 2015, Pubmed
Shu, Structure of STING bound to cyclic di-GMP reveals the mechanism of cyclic dinucleotide recognition by the immune system. 2012, Pubmed
Strimmer, fdrtool: a versatile R package for estimating local and tail area-based false discovery rates. 2008, Pubmed
Studier, Protein production by auto-induction in high density shaking cultures. 2005, Pubmed
Sun, Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is a cytosolic DNA sensor that activates the type I interferon pathway. 2013, Pubmed
Surpris, Cutting Edge: Novel Tmem173 Allele Reveals Importance of STING N Terminus in Trafficking and Type I IFN Production. 2016, Pubmed
Takamatsu, Functional characterization of domains of IPS-1 using an inducible oligomerization system. 2013, Pubmed
Tan, Innate Immune Signaling Organelles Display Natural and Programmable Signaling Flexibility. 2019, Pubmed
Tan, Detection of Microbial Infections Through Innate Immune Sensing of Nucleic Acids. 2018, Pubmed
Tanaka, STING specifies IRF3 phosphorylation by TBK1 in the cytosolic DNA signaling pathway. 2012, Pubmed
Waterhouse, Jalview Version 2--a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. 2009, Pubmed
Wu, Assembly of post-receptor signaling complexes for the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily. 2004, Pubmed
Wu, Innate immune sensing and signaling of cytosolic nucleic acids. 2014, Pubmed
Xie, Dampened STING-Dependent Interferon Activation in Bats. 2018, Pubmed
Ye, Distinct molecular mechanism for initiating TRAF6 signalling. 2002, Pubmed
Yin, E2 interaction and dimerization in the crystal structure of TRAF6. 2009, Pubmed
Yin, Cyclic di-GMP sensing via the innate immune signaling protein STING. 2012, Pubmed
Zhang, Cyclic GMP-AMP containing mixed phosphodiester linkages is an endogenous high-affinity ligand for STING. 2013, Pubmed
Zhang, Structural basis of STING binding with and phosphorylation by TBK1. 2019, Pubmed
Zhao, Structural basis for concerted recruitment and activation of IRF-3 by innate immune adaptor proteins. 2016, Pubmed
Zhong, The adaptor protein MITA links virus-sensing receptors to IRF3 transcription factor activation. 2008, Pubmed