XB-ART-56893
Nature
2020 Mar 01;5797799:448-451. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2088-0.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Structure of SWI/SNF chromatin remodeller RSC bound to a nucleosome.
Wagner FR
,
Dienemann C
,
Wang H
,
Stützer A
,
Tegunov D
,
Urlaub H
,
Cramer P
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Chromatin-remodelling complexes of the SWI/SNF family function in the formation of nucleosome-depleted, transcriptionally active promoter regions (NDRs)1,2. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the essential SWI/SNF complex RSC3 contains 16 subunits, including the ATP-dependent DNA translocase Sth14,5. RSC removes nucleosomes from promoter regions6,7 and positions the specialized +1 and -1 nucleosomes that flank NDRs8,9. Here we present the cryo-electron microscopy structure of RSC in complex with a nucleosome substrate. The structure reveals that RSC forms five protein modules and suggests key features of the remodelling mechanism. The body module serves as a scaffold for the four flexible modules that we call DNA-interacting, ATPase, arm and actin-related protein (ARP) modules. The DNA-interacting module binds extra-nucleosomal DNA and is involved in the recognition of promoter DNA elements8,10,11 that influence RSC functionality12. The ATPase and arm modules sandwich the nucleosome disc with the Snf2 ATP-coupling (SnAC) domain and the finger helix, respectively. The translocase motor of the ATPase module engages with the edge of the nucleosome at superhelical location +2. The mobile ARP module may modulate translocase-nucleosome interactions to regulate RSC activity5. The RSC-nucleosome structure provides a basis for understanding NDR formation and the structure and function of human SWI/SNF complexes that are frequently mutated in cancer13.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 32188943
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC7093204
???displayArticle.link??? Nature
???displayArticle.grants??? [+]
693023 European Research Council
Species referenced: Xenopus laevis
Genes referenced: h2ac21 h2bc21
???attribute.lit??? ???displayArticles.show???
![]() |
Extended Data Figure 2. Cryo-EM analysis of the RSC-nucleosome complex. Related to Figures 1 â 3.a. Representative cryo-EM micrograph of the RSC-nucleosome complex shows homogeneously distributed individual particles.b-d. 2D class averages of the RSC-nucleosome complex (b), the ATPase-nucleosome subcomplex (c) and the nucleosome subcomplex (d).e. Fourier shell correlation plots reveal the overall resolutions of the cryo-EM reconstructions.f. Cryo-EM processing workflow for the reconstructions of the RSC-nucleosome complex, the ATPase-nucleosome subcomplex, and the nucleosome subcomplex. Particle distribution after 3D classifications is indicated below the corresponding map. The final maps are shown in colours. The masks used for focused classifications and refinements are colour coded corresponding to the final maps they were used for. Views are generally rotated by 180° with respect to Figure 1c, left.g. Local resolution estimation of the combined ATPase-nucleosome map as implemented in RELION42. We note that the resolution of the peripheral area with the ATPase module is overestimated.h-j. Angular distribution plot for all particles contributing to the final reconstructions of the RSC-nucleosome complex (h), the ATPase-nucleosome subcomplex (i) and the nucleosome subcomplex (j). |
![]() |
Extended Data Figure 3. Cryo-EM analysis of the free RSC complex. Related to Figures 1 â 3.a. Representative cryo-EM micrograph of the free RSC complex shows homogeneously spaced individual particles.b. 2D class averages of the free RSC complex.c. Cryo-EM processing workflow for the reconstruction of the free RSC complex. Particle distribution after 3D classifications is indicated below the corresponding map. The final maps after focused 3D refinement and masks are depicted in colour. Views are generally rotated by 180° with respect to Figure 1c, right.d. Angular distribution plot for all particles contributing to the final reconstruction of the free RSC complex.e. Two views of the combined RSC core map coloured according to the local resolution as implemented in RELION42.f. Fourier shell correlation plots of the maps used for model building of the RSC core complex. |
![]() |
Extended Data Figure 4. Cryo-EM densities for selected RSC regions. Related to Figures 1 â 3.a-c. Examples of map quality. Close-up of the Rsc4 β-sheet shows clear separation of individual strands (a). The high quality of the map for the ZZ zinc finger of Rsc8 allowed backbone tracing and placement of side chains as well as for the zinc ion (b). Coiled coil helices of the two Rsc8 subunits with density for one helix (c).d. View along the exit DNA in the direction of the nucleosome showing the low pass-filtered maps for the modules ATPase, ARP, DIM, arm, body, and the nucleosome. At the site where the H2A C-terminal tail protrudes from the nucleosome near Sfh1, low resolution density connecting the arm module and the nucleosome is visible. Density bridging form the ARP module to the exit DNA close to the H3 histone tail can be observed.e. Density representing the finger helix (green) at the acidic patch of the nucleosome (indicated by H2A in yellow). Side chain density is visible for conserved arginine residues.f. Interaction of RSC with the nucleosome is sterically impaired by the flexibly bound ubiquitin moiety at H2B lysine 123 (human K120). The Sfh1 finger helix and the ubiquitin moiety (ubiquitylated nucleosome PDB code 6NOG)75 overlap after superposition of nucleosomes. |
![]() |
Extended Data Figure 5. Structure of RSC body and arm modules, cancer mutations and remodeler families. Related to Figure 1.a. Cartoon representation of RSC core viewed as in Figure 1. Important structural elements are labelled.b. Conservation between SWI/SNF complexes RSC (yeast) and PBAF (human). Residues that are identical (blue) or conserved (light blue) in human PBAF highlighted on the RSC structure (grey). Purple spheres depict identical residues that show missense mutations in various cancers (Methods).c. Comparison of overall structure of RSC with complexes of INO80 (yeast INO8076) and CHD (yeast CHD177) families. ATPase motor domains are shown in orange, DNA in blue. With regard to the INO80 family, the ATPase of the SWR1 complex also binds SHL +278, whereas the ATPase of the INO80 complex binds SHL â676,79. The ARP module of INO80 contacts exit DNA, which is not the case in RSC. The INO80 complex also contacts both faces of the histone octamer76, resembling the sandwiching interactions made by RSC on a topological level. With respect to the CHD family, the ATPase motor of yeast Chd1 also binds SHL +2, but its DNA-binding region engages with exit DNA near the nucleosome, leading to a different DNA trajectory77,80. With respect to the ISWI family, the ATPase motor binds SHL +281, but other interactions have not been structurally resolved (not shown). |
![]() |
Extended Data Figure 6. Course of polypeptide chains of architectural subunits Sth1, Rsc8, Rsc58 and ATPase-nucleosome interactions. Related to Figure 1.a. Back view of RSC. The Sth1 subunit of RSC starts with its N-terminus in the body module and tracks through it turning around with a contact helix and loop. Forming the central helix I, the hook and the central helix II it folds back and forth tightly interweaving the body module before it exits with its HSA region through the ARP module to build the ATPase module.b. RSC with the domains of the two Rsc8 subunits highlighted in blue. Both Rsc8 start N-terminal with their SWIRM domains in the arm module where they support the two repeat domains of Sfh1 in a similar manner. They then follow distinct paths through the arm towards the body module where they contribute with both their SANT and ZZ zinc finger domains. Here the two domains of each subunit form different contacts with various interactions partners and whereas one ZZ zinc finger domain is tightly packed at the body and DNA-interaction module interface, the other seems to extend from the body, presumably as additional interaction surface. Both Rsc8 subunits unite again with their C-terminal long helices in a coiled coil fold on the opposite side of the body module.c. Rsc58 N-terminal bromodomain attaches to the top of the body module. Then, Rsc58 follows an interwound path through the body module via the central and connector loop. It turns back docking to the body with a 3-helix bundle and stabilizing the module with its C-terminal end.d. Contacts of Sth1 ATPase motor (orange) with the nucleosome. View as in Fig. 1c, left, but rotated by 45° around a horizontal axis. Arrows indicate directionality of DNA translocation. |
![]() |
Extended Data Figure 7. DNA recognition and NDR formation. Related to Figure 1.a. Space-filling RSC-nucleosome structure with DIM (green) and SnAC (orange) densities. View on the top as in Fig. 1c, left, but rotated by 90° around the vertical and horizontal axis. Arrows indicate directionality of DNA translocation. Number of upstream DNA base pairs relative to SHL â7 is provided.b. Schematic of a promoter before (top) and after (bottom) RSC remodelling shows NDR formation by sliding the flanking â1 and +1 nucleosomes away from the NDR center. Arrows indicate the transcription start site. |
![]() |
Extended Data Figure 8. Sequence alignments for the Sth1 ATPase domain and HSA region. Related to Figures 1 â 3.a. Sequence alignment of the S. cerevisiae Sth1 ATPase domain to the homologous Snf2 ATPase domain of the same organism. Secondary structure elements are represented in orange according to the cryo-EM structure of the Snf2 ATPase (PDB entry 5Z3U)17. Residues modelled in the Snf2 structure are topped by a back line with helical regions shown as cylinders and sheet regions as arrows. The Sth1 residues modelled in this work are indicated with a black dashed line below. ATPase motifs are underlined. Invariant residues are coloured in dark blue and conserved residues in light blue. The alignment was generated with MSAProbs71 within the MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit60 and visualized using ESPript82.b. Sequence alignment of the HSA regions from S. cerevisiae homologues Sth1 and Snf2. Illustration and generation of the alignment as in (a). |
![]() |
Figure 1. RSC-nucleosome complex structure.a. Two views of the low pass-filtered cryo-EM density reveal the overall architecture. The five RSC modules are in different colours. The nucleosome with exit DNA is in yellow. DIM, DNA-interaction module.b. RSC subunit domain architecture. Domain boundaries marked with residue numbers. Black bars indicate modelled regions. HSA, helicase-SANT-associated; SnAC, Snf2 ATP coupling; bromo, bromodomain; armadillo, armadillo repeat fold; RFX, DNA-binding RFX-type winged-helix; SWIRM, Swi3 Rsc8 Moira; ZZ, ZZ-type zinc finger; SANT, Swi3 Ada N-Cor TFIIIB; Zn, Zn(2)-C6 fungal-type zinc finger; RPT, repeat; BAH, bromo-adjacent homology.c. Cartoon representation. Unassigned elements in grey. Mobile domains depicted schematically. Arrows indicate directionality of DNA translocation. |
![]() |
Figure 2. RSC ATPase and ARP modules.View along the nucleosome dyad (black oval). View as in Fig. 1c, right, but rotated by 45° around a horizontal axis. |
![]() |
Figure 3. RSC sandwiches the nucleosome.a. RSC-nucleosome interactions viewed along the nucleosome dyad (black oval). On the outer face of the histone octamer, densities for the Sth1 SnAC domain and the histone H4 tail are shown as an orange surface and a green mesh, respectively. On the inner face, the arm module and Sfh1 finger helix are depicted.b. Interaction of the Sfh1 finger helix with the acidic patch of the inner face of the histone octamer (surface representation coloured by electrostatic charge; red, negative; blue, positive). Conserved arginine residues are depicted. Residues mutated in cancer (Methods) highlighted in purple.c. Sequence alignment of the finger helix region (green cylinder) in S. cerevisiaeâs (Sc) Sfh1 with its homologs H. sapiens (Hs) BAF47, M. musculus (Mm) BAF47, D. melanogaster (Dm) SNR1 and ScSnf5. Invariant and conserved residues highlighted in dark and light blue, respectively. Yellow boxes contain arginine residues shown in (b). Purple dots mark residues mutated in cancer (Methods). |
References [+] :
,
Closing of the Nurse-Midwifery Service at Boston City Hospital: What Were the Issues Involved?
1989, Pubmed
, Closing of the Nurse-Midwifery Service at Boston City Hospital: What Were the Issues Involved? 1989, Pubmed
Adams, PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. 2010, Pubmed
Angus-Hill, A Rsc3/Rsc30 zinc cluster dimer reveals novel roles for the chromatin remodeler RSC in gene expression and cell cycle control. 2001, Pubmed
Asturias, Structural analysis of the RSC chromatin-remodeling complex. 2002, Pubmed
Ayala, Structure and regulation of the human INO80-nucleosome complex. 2018, Pubmed
Badis, A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. 2008, Pubmed
Barillo, Traumatic cholecystoduodenal fistula--a case report. 1986, Pubmed
Barlow, Lipid metabolism in gout. 1966, Pubmed
Barton, Communicate to educate. 1978, Pubmed
Bienert, The SWISS-MODEL Repository-new features and functionality. 2017, Pubmed
Bond, ALINE: a WYSIWYG protein-sequence alignment editor for publication-quality alignments. 2009, Pubmed
Brahma, RSC-Associated Subnucleosomes Define MNase-Sensitive Promoters in Yeast. 2019, Pubmed
Brogaard, A map of nucleosome positions in yeast at base-pair resolution. 2012, Pubmed
Buchan, The PSIPRED Protein Analysis Workbench: 20 years on. 2019, Pubmed
Cairns, RSC, an essential, abundant chromatin-remodeling complex. 1996, Pubmed
Cairns, Two functionally distinct forms of the RSC nucleosome-remodeling complex, containing essential AT hook, BAH, and bromodomains. 1999, Pubmed
Cakiroglu, Genome-wide reconstitution of chromatin transactions reveals that RSC preferentially disrupts H2AZ-containing nucleosomes. 2019, Pubmed
Cerami, The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. 2012, Pubmed
Chaban, Structure of a RSC-nucleosome complex and insights into chromatin remodeling. 2008, Pubmed
Chambers, The BAH domain of Rsc2 is a histone H3 binding domain. 2013, Pubmed
Charlop-Powers, Structural insights into selective histone H3 recognition by the human Polybromo bromodomain 2. 2010, Pubmed
Clapier, Mechanisms of action and regulation of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodelling complexes. 2017, Pubmed
Clapier, Regulation of DNA Translocation Efficiency within the Chromatin Remodeler RSC/Sth1 Potentiates Nucleosome Sliding and Ejection. 2016, Pubmed
Combe, xiNET: cross-link network maps with residue resolution. 2015, Pubmed
Da, Structure and function of the SWIRM domain, a conserved protein module found in chromatin regulatory complexes. 2006, Pubmed
Dechassa, SWI/SNF has intrinsic nucleosome disassembly activity that is dependent on adjacent nucleosomes. 2010, Pubmed
Descamps-Latscha, Generation of reactive oxygen species in whole blood from patients with acute falciparum malaria. 1987, Pubmed
Dyer, Reconstitution of nucleosome core particles from recombinant histones and DNA. 2004, Pubmed
Emsley, Features and development of Coot. 2010, Pubmed
Eustermann, Structural basis for ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling by the INO80 complex. 2018, Pubmed
Farnung, Nucleosome-Chd1 structure and implications for chromatin remodelling. 2017, Pubmed
Fotter, Unstable bladder in children: functional evaluation by modified voiding cystourethrography. 1986, Pubmed
Foulkes, Antagonistic effects of insulin and beta-adrenergic agonists on the activity of protein phosphatase inhibitor-1 in skeletal muscle of the perfused rat hemicorpus. 1982, Pubmed
Gao, Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. 2013, Pubmed
Goddard, UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. 2018, Pubmed
Grice, Generalized follicular mucinosis with myxaedema. 1968, Pubmed
Grimm, xVis: a web server for the schematic visualization and interpretation of crosslink-derived spatial restraints. 2015, Pubmed
Gupta, Effect of thyroxine on immune response in C57Bl/6J mice. 1983, Pubmed
Hudnall, Evaluation of pediatric cadaver kidneys transplanted into adult recipients receiving cyclosporine. 1989, Pubmed
Jaim-Etcheverry, Cytochemical localization of monoamine stores in sheep thyroid gland at the electron microscope level. 1969, Pubmed
Jones, Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. 1999, Pubmed
Kasten, Tandem bromodomains in the chromatin remodeler RSC recognize acetylated histone H3 Lys14. 2004, Pubmed
Kastner, GraFix: sample preparation for single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. 2008, Pubmed
Kidmose, Namdinator - automatic molecular dynamics flexible fitting of structural models into cryo-EM and crystallography experimental maps. 2019, Pubmed
Kisor, Variability of indocyanine green clearance. 1989, Pubmed
Klein-Brill, Dynamics of Chromatin and Transcription during Transient Depletion of the RSC Chromatin Remodeling Complex. 2019, Pubmed
Krietenstein, Genomic Nucleosome Organization Reconstituted with Pure Proteins. 2016, Pubmed
Kubik, Nucleosome Stability Distinguishes Two Different Promoter Types at All Protein-Coding Genes in Yeast. 2015, Pubmed
Kubik, Sequence-Directed Action of RSC Remodeler and General Regulatory Factors Modulates +1 Nucleosome Position to Facilitate Transcription. 2018, Pubmed
Lavergne, Discontinuities in occlusal relationship and the regulation of facial growth. A cybernetic view. 1984, Pubmed
Legge, ZZ domain of CBP: an unusual zinc finger fold in a protein interaction module. 2004, Pubmed
Leschziner, Conformational flexibility in the chromatin remodeler RSC observed by electron microscopy and the orthogonal tilt reconstruction method. 2007, Pubmed
Li, Mechanism of DNA translocation underlying chromatin remodelling by Snf2. 2019, Pubmed
Liu, MSAProbs: multiple sequence alignment based on pair hidden Markov models and partition function posterior probabilities. 2010, Pubmed
Lorch, Histone Acetylation Inhibits RSC and Stabilizes the +1 Nucleosome. 2018, Pubmed
Lorch, Isolation and assay of the RSC chromatin-remodeling complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 2004, Pubmed
Lorch, Chromatin-remodeling for transcription. 2017, Pubmed
Lorch, Role of DNA sequence in chromatin remodeling and the formation of nucleosome-free regions. 2014, Pubmed
Lowary, New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. 1998, Pubmed
Luger, Expression and purification of recombinant histones and nucleosome reconstitution. 1999, Pubmed
Maskell, Structural basis for retroviral integration into nucleosomes. 2015, Pubmed
Materne, Histone H2B ubiquitylation represses gametogenesis by opposing RSC-dependent chromatin remodeling at the ste11 master regulator locus. 2016, Pubmed
Nicolas, Molecular cloning of polybromo, a nuclear protein containing multiple domains including five bromodomains, a truncated HMG-box, and two repeats of a novel domain. 1996, Pubmed
Parker, Sensitivity to alpha/beta-interferon is independent of N-linked complex-type oligosaccharides on cell-surface-membrane glycoproteins. 1985, Pubmed
Patel, Architecture of the chromatin remodeler RSC and insights into its nucleosome engagement. 2019, Pubmed
Pettersen, UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. 2004, Pubmed
Pulice, Composition and Function of Mammalian SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Complexes in Human Disease. 2016, Pubmed
Ramachandran, Asymmetric nucleosomes flank promoters in the budding yeast genome. 2015, Pubmed
Raman, Structure prediction for CASP8 with all-atom refinement using Rosetta. 2009, Pubmed
Reichen, Structures of designed armadillo-repeat proteins show propagation of inter-repeat interface effects. 2016, Pubmed
Rigaut, A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. 1999, Pubmed
Robert, Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. 2014, Pubmed
Saffar, [Development of periodontitis in the hamster. Quantitative macroscopic study of the accumulation of bacterial plaque and of alveolysis]. 1983, Pubmed
Saha, Chromatin remodeling by RSC involves ATP-dependent DNA translocation. 2002, Pubmed
Saha, Chromatin remodeling through directional DNA translocation from an internal nucleosomal site. 2005, Pubmed , Xenbase
Sandhya, Domain architecture of BAF250a reveals the ARID and ARM-repeat domains with implication in function and assembly of the BAF remodeling complex. 2018, Pubmed
Satterwhite, The BCL11 gene family: involvement of BCL11A in lymphoid malignancies. 2001, Pubmed , Xenbase
Schubert, Structure of an actin-related subcomplex of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeler. 2013, Pubmed
Sen, The SnAC domain of SWI/SNF is a histone anchor required for remodeling. 2013, Pubmed , Xenbase
Shedden, Early stages of development in the caudal neural tube of the golden Syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). 1988, Pubmed
Song, High-resolution comparative modeling with RosettaCM. 2013, Pubmed
Stark, GraFix: stabilization of fragile macromolecular complexes for single particle cryo-EM. 2010, Pubmed
Sundaramoorthy, Structure of the chromatin remodelling enzyme Chd1 bound to a ubiquitinylated nucleosome. 2018, Pubmed , Xenbase
Suto, Crystal structure of a nucleosome core particle containing the variant histone H2A.Z. 2000, Pubmed , Xenbase
Szerlong, The HSA domain binds nuclear actin-related proteins to regulate chromatin-remodeling ATPases. 2008, Pubmed
Taneda, Genetic analysis of RSC58, which encodes a component of a yeast chromatin remodeling complex, and interacts with the transcription factor Swi6. 2004, Pubmed
Treich, Direct interaction between Rsc6 and Rsc8/Swh3,two proteins that are conserved in SWI/SNF-related complexes. 1998, Pubmed
VanDemark, Autoregulation of the rsc4 tandem bromodomain by gcn5 acetylation. 2007, Pubmed
van Dijk, 3D-DART: a DNA structure modelling server. 2009, Pubmed
van Oosterom, The effect of torso inhomogeneities on body surface potentials quantified using "tailored" geometry. 1989, Pubmed
Wang, Architectural DNA binding by a high-mobility-group/kinesin-like subunit in mammalian SWI/SNF-related complexes. 1998, Pubmed
Warden, Respiratory insufficiency following near-drowning in sea water. 1967, Pubmed
Waterhouse, SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. 2018, Pubmed
Weber, [Albescent punctate retinopathy with central pigment epithelium atrophy]. 1984, Pubmed
Willhoft, Structure and dynamics of the yeast SWR1-nucleosome complex. 2018, Pubmed
Williams, MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. 2018, Pubmed
Worden, Mechanism of Cross-talk between H2B Ubiquitination and H3 Methylation by Dot1L. 2019, Pubmed , Xenbase
Xue, The human SWI/SNF-B chromatin-remodeling complex is related to yeast rsc and localizes at kinetochores of mitotic chromosomes. 2000, Pubmed
Yan, Structures of the ISWI-nucleosome complex reveal a conserved mechanism of chromatin remodeling. 2019, Pubmed
Yan, PBAF chromatin-remodeling complex requires a novel specificity subunit, BAF200, to regulate expression of selective interferon-responsive genes. 2005, Pubmed
Yang, Identification of cross-linked peptides from complex samples. 2012, Pubmed
Ye, Structure of the RSC complex bound to the nucleosome. 2019, Pubmed
Zimmermann, A Completely Reimplemented MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit with a New HHpred Server at its Core. 2018, Pubmed
Zivanov, New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. 2018, Pubmed