Pelletier JF , Field CM , Fürthauer S , Sonnett M , Mitchison TJ .

R35 GM131753 NIGMS NIH HHS , R35GM131753 NIGMS NIH HHS , MBL fellowships Ed Evans Foundation

             microtubule
             cytoplasm organization
             actomyosin

	Figure 1. MTOC separation movement in Xenopus eggs and egg extract.Panels A-C are fixed embryos, and panels D-F are in Xenopus egg extract. (A) Cartoon illustrating MTOC movement away from the CPC-positive midplane before astral microtubules (MTs) reach the cortex in Xenopus laevis eggs. MTs shown in cyan and CPC-positive interaction zone in magenta. Note the CPC is shown in the cartoon panels A and D, but not in the rest of the figure. (B,C) Anti-tubulin immunofluorescence of eggs fixed ~70 and ~85 min post-fertilization (pf). Diagonal lines connecting different eggs in panels B and C emphasize centrosome separation movement and the growing aster periphery. (B’,C’) Anti-LNPK (ER) immunofluorescence of the same eggs. (D) Cartoon illustrating aster separation movement in an extract system. MTs and CPC as in panel A. Asters were reconstituted from artificial microtubule organizing centers (MTOCs) in interphase Xenopus egg extracts. (E,F) MTOCs moved apart as asters grew and interacted with one another over time. Time is defined with respect to perfusing the sample and warming to 20°C, so the start of aster growth occurred soon after 0 min. (F’) A fraction of the ER became enriched around MTOCs, and (F’’) F-actin was disassembled locally along interaction zones.Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Higher magnification imaging around MTOCs included signatures of both co-movement and relative movement of astral MTs, ER, and F-actin.(Related to Figure 1, Video 1) (A) MTs imaged at near-speckle concentrations with tubulin-Alexa Fluor 647, ER labeled with DiI, and F-actin labeled with Lifeact-GFP. Images taken on a spinning disk confocal microscope with 60x objective. (B) Radial kymographs generated by averaging the intensity over 10° sectors originating at the MTOC. One end remained pinned at the MTOC, and the other end rotated with the average flow of ER, so features would remain in the sector, and the kymograph would highlight their radial movement. To guide the eye, the solid lines indicate the growing aster periphery (slope corresponds to 30 µm/min), and the dotted lines track with outward sliding of tubulin speckles away from the MTOC (slope corresponds to 3 µm/min). (C) Tangential kymographs generated along a circle centered on the MTOC, so moving features represent tangential displacement with respect to the MTOC.
	Figure 2. MTOC separation movement in egg extract by dynein and actomyosin.(A) The CPC localized to interaction zones between neighboring asters, blocking mutual interpenetration of MTs and disassembling F-actin locally. Time is defined with respect to perfusing the sample and warming to 20°C, so the start of aster growth occurred soon after 0 min. (B) Four aster growth reactions were followed in parallel under control vs inhibitor conditions. The first column in each condition shows an early time point, and the second column shows a time point 30 min later. MT growth was similar and CPC-positive interaction zones formed under all conditions (see Video 3). (C) Maximum speed of separation with respect to initial distance between the MTOCs. Red lines indicate linear fits to red points.Figure 2—source data 1. MTOC trajectories and Delaunay triangulations for panels B and C.The ‘beads’ variables are structures that contain the MTOC trajectories. Some MTOCs enter or exit the image during the movie, and the ‘t’ field within each element represents the frames during which an MTOC was present, with 1 the first frame and 10 the last frame. The ‘x’ and ‘y’ fields represent the MTOC position, and the ‘nn’ field represents the indices of the nearest neighbor MTOCs defined by the Delaunay triangulation. The ‘pairs’ variables enumerate all pairs of nearest neighbor MTOCs, that is, the edges in panel B. The last column is 0 if the corresponding interaction zone was not CPC-positive, and 0.5 or 1 if the corresponding interaction was CPC-positive. The ‘edges’ variables list all neighboring edges for each edge.
	Figure 3. ER and F-actin move with MTs in separating asters.(A,B) Asters grew until they reached their neighbors, formed interaction zones approximately equidistant between the MTOCs, then moved away from the interaction zones (see Video 2). MTOC trajectories are represented by contours colored from blue to yellow. Time is defined with respect to perfusing the sample and warming to 20°C, so the start of aster growth occurred soon after 0 min. (C) Intensity kymographs along the gray line shown in panels A and B, passing through the MTOCs marked with a white star. To show relative movement of the MTOCs, each row of the kymograph was computationally translated to keep stationary the midpoint between the MTOCs, where the interaction zone formed. Solid curves indicate the MTOCs, the dashed curve indicates the growing aster periphery, and the dash-dotted line indicates the interaction zone. (D) Velocity maps in the same frame of reference as in panel C. 2D flow fields were measured by particle image velocimetry (PIV), projected onto the line passing through the MTOCs, then the projected velocity of the midpoint between the MTOCs was subtracted, again to show movement relative to the interaction zone. A white color indicates stationary with respect to the midpoint, blue indicates moving to the left, and red to the right. PIV outliers were filtered and shown in beige. (E) Velocity of the MTOCs based on particle tracking, as well as the velocity of ER and F-actin in the neighborhood of the MTOCs based on PIV. (F) Velocity of ER with respect to the moving MTOCs, not with respect to the interaction zone as in panel D.Figure 3—source data 1. Velocity maps for panel D, as well as the full 2D velocity fields from PIV used to generate the velocity maps.Velocities in the neighborhood of the MTOCs (from PIV for the ER and F-actin, and from particle tracking for the MTOC) for panel E.Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Higher magnification imaging around zones included signatures of both co-movement and relative movement of astral MTs, ER, and F-actin.(Related to Figure 3, Video 4) (A) MTs labeled with tubulin-Alexa Fluor 647, ER labeled with DiI, and F-actin labeled with Lifeact-GFP. Images taken on a spinning disk confocal microscope with 60x objective. (B) Kymographs along the line indicated in panel A. (C) Velocity maps in the same frame of reference as panel B. Velocity maps represent the horizontal component of the velocity estimated by PIV. (D) Temporal montage of the box indicated in panel A’ showing an example of deformation of the ER. Time with respect to the start of the montage.
	Figure 4. ER and F-actin move with MTs on coverslips functionalized with dynein.(A) Coverslips were functionalized with an antibody against HOOK2, so the rigid coverslip substrate generated pulling forces on the astral MTs. (B) Circular oscillatory trajectory of the MTOC (see Video 5). (C) X coordinate of the MTOC. (D) Speed of the MTOC relative to the coverslip, including both X and Y components of motion. (E) Intensity kymographs along the horizontal line passing through the MTOC, indicated in panel B. (F) Velocity maps in the same frame of reference as in panel E. 2D velocity fields were measured by particle image velocimetry (PIV) then projected onto the horizontal line as in panel E. The MTOC position is shown as a black curve.Figure 4—source data 1. Velocity maps for panel F, as well as the full 2D velocity fields from PIV used to generate the velocity maps.Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Characterization of the HOOK2 C-terminal peptide antibody.(Related to Figures 4, 5 and 8) We performed immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS) on Protein G Dynabeads functionalized with anti-HOOK2. In three repeat extracts, we measured three conditions: anti-HOOK2 in interphase extracts (columns 1 to 3), anti-HOOK2 in mitotic extracts (columns 4 and 5), and as negative control, random IgG in interphase (columns 6 through 8). HOOK2 conditions were normalized so the amount of HOOK2 was constant. Random IgG conditions were normalized to have the same IgG count as the average IgG count of the HOOK2 columns. Then for each protein, the sum across channels was normalized, so the abundance values represent relative enrichment across the eight channels. Abundances are shown on a log scale with base 2. We here show dynein subunits (blue), dynactin subunits (red), and other proteins known to interact with dynein-dynactin (yellow, green) that came down in the immunoprecipitations. The interaction between HOOK2 and the dynein-dynactin complex was stronger in interphase (left columns) than in mitosis (middle columns).Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS) counts for Figure 4—figure supplement 1.
	Figure 5. A small molecule is advected with moving asters.(A) To track the flow of a small molecule within moving asters, MTOCs were functionalized with caged fluorescein. (B) Caged fluorescein, before uncaging. (B’) Astral MTs radiating from the MTOC filled the region. The aster was oscillating on a coverslip functionalized with anti-HOOK2 as in Figure 4. (C) Fluorescein, after uncaging. (D) Within tens of seconds, the fluorescein diffused away from the MTOC and approached the background intensity (see Video 7). 2D Gaussian fits to estimate the width and center of the fluorescein cloud. The bright MTOC was excluded from the Gaussian fit, so uncaged fluorescein that remained bound to the MTOC did not bias the fitted position. (E) Expansion of the fluorescein cloud width fit to a model of diffusion. (F) Several replicate trajectories of the MTOC (circle) and the center of the fluorescein cloud (plus).Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Hypothetical constant flow permeating asters can improve registration between MTOC and center of fluorescein cloud.(Related to Figure 5) (A) Trajectory of MTOC (circle) and center of the fluorescein cloud, within aster oscillating on HOOK2-functionalized coverslip, same as Figure 5F. (B) Trajectory of MTOC (circle) and center of the fluorescein cloud after computationally subtracting a constant flow (square). Flow direction and magnitude shown as a black arrow above each panel. The hypothetical constant flow was optimized to minimize the difference between the MTOC and cloud trajectories.Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Width of the fluorescein cloud vs time for panel E, and MTOC and cloud center trajectories for panel F.The ‘driftVec’ variables are the hypothetical constant flow that was optimized to minimize the difference between the MTOC and cloud trajectories for Figure 5—figure supplement 1.
	Figure 5—figure supplement 2. Separating asters exhibited saddle-shaped flow fields, consistent with advection of cytosol by moving asters.(Related to Figure 5) (A,B) F-actin labeled with Lifeact-GFP, CPC labeled with anti-INCENP-Alexa Fluor 647, and MTs labeled with Tau-mCherry. (C) Differential interference contrast to visualize mitochondria and other small vesicles. (D) Flow fields of the DIC channel estimated by PIV exhibited a saddle shape, with flow along the interaction zone toward the midpoint between the asters. F-actin and MTs exhibited similar flow fields. Color represents direction (legend in upper right of first panel), and brightness represents velocity. Note that arrows are downsampled from full flow fields. Time with respect to warming the sample and the onset of aster polymerization.
	Figure 6. Dynein-mediated organelle movement is restricted by F-actin.(A) In control with intact F-actin, a small amount of ER became concentrated around the MTOC, but the majority of the ER and mitochondria remained distributed over the aster (see Video 8). The white arc indicates the growing aster periphery, and the box indicates the zoomed region in the lower panels. (A’) Average intensity with respect to distance from the MTOC over time, from black to gray. (B) When F-actin was fragmented with Cytochalasin D, a greater fraction of the ER was transported toward the MTOC, and a fraction of mitochondria was transported as well. Higher magnification: ER started to move when MTs indicated by growing +TIPs first grew into the cytoplasm, and ER and mitochondria co-localized with one another. (C) When dynein was inhibited with p150-CC1, the ER was not transported, neither toward nor away from the MTOC.Figure 6—source data 1. ER and mitochondria intensity profiles for panels A’, B’, and C’.Intensity profiles were normalized to the average intensity outside the aster to correct for photobleaching.
	Figure 7. Dynein-mediated organelle movement is maximal on the aster periphery.(A) Stationary asters were grown from isolated MTOCs. The growing aster periphery is indicated by a white arc, and the ER was largely distributed but slightly depleted just inside the growing aster periphery. The ER exhibited a change in texture from slightly coarser outside the aster to finer inside the aster (see Video 9). (B) Kymographs along a line extending away from the MTOC. The MTOC corresponds to the left column, and the growing aster periphery corresponds to the diagonal line where soluble tubulin is depleted upon incorporation into the growing aster. (C) Mass transport map for ER averaged over a quadrant, in the same frame of reference as the kymographs in panel B. Mass transport analysis is described in Figure 7—figure supplement 2. (D–F) Similar experiment with F-actin intact, in a different batch of extract that exhibited less organelle movement. (G–J) Similar experiment with F-actin fragmented by Cytochalasin D (see Video 10). (J) Average speed based on PIV, in the same frame of reference as panels H,I and averaged over a quadrant. PIV is not shown for control because movement was too slow to be reliably quantified.Figure 7—source data 1. Mass transport maps for panels C, F, and I (in units of % of total per min), and PIV maps for panel J (in µm/s).Figure 7—figure supplement 1. Like other organelles, mitochondria exhibited a burst of organelle movement near the growing aster periphery.(Related to Figures 6 and 7, Video 11) (A) F-actin was fragmented by Cytochalasin D. Microtubules were labeled with tubulin-Alexa Fluor 647, ER with DiD, and mitochondria with TMRE. (B) Kymographs along a line from the MTOC. (C) Mass transport map for ER and mitochondria averaged over a quadrant, in the same frame of reference as the kymographs in panel B. Mass transport analysis is described in Figure 7—figure supplement 2. (D) Average speed based on PIV, in the same frame of reference as panels B and C, and averaged over a quadrant. In all analysis methods, mitochondria behaved similar to acidic organelles and likewise exhibited a burst of movement at the growing aster periphery.
	Figure 7—figure supplement 2. Explanation of flux analysis of organelle transport.(Related to Figure 7) (A,B) Subsequent frames in a video to measure dynein-based flux of organelles along astral MTs. The flux analysis requires that the region of interest (ROI) contains the entire aster at all times, so there is no transport of organelles into or out of the ROI, just radial redistribution of organelles along astral MTs within the ROI. Images were flat field corrected, then normalized to constant total intensity to correct for photobleaching. (C) Kymograph of average organelle intensity in concentric rings away from the MTOC. Frames 31 (green, panel A) and 32 (purple, panel B) correspond to the rows of the kymograph indicated by horizontal dotted lines. The distance to the aster periphery at this time, indicated by the white dotted arc in panels A and B, is indicated by the vertical white dotted line. (D) Average organelle intensity in concentric rings away from the MTOC. (E) Total intensity in concentric rings away from the MTOC. The total intensity increases roughly linearly with the circumference. (F) Cumulative total intensity away from the MTOC. Zoomed inset shows where the cumulative total intensity at frame 32 most exceeds that at frame 31. (G) Flux of fluorescence intensity toward the MTOC, calculated as the cumulative total intensity at frame 32 minus that at frame 31. Flux was normalized to the percentage of the total fluorescence intensity moving across each bin edge (10 µm) per min. (H) Flux map in the same frame of reference as the kymograph in panel C. Panel G corresponds to the row indicated by the horizontal black dotted line.
	Figure 7—figure supplement 3. Dextran was excluded in organelle-rich region within ~50 µm of MTOCs.(Related to Figures 7 and 8, Video 13) (A) The growing +TIPs of MTs were labeled with EB1-GFP, the relative concentration of cytosol was inferred from 10 kDa dextran labeled with Alexa-Fluor 568, and organelles were visualized with differential interference contrast (DIC). Images taken 18.3 min after warming to 20°C and the onset of aster growth. (B,C) Intensity profiles away from the MTOC colored by time point. In the EB1 graph, the wavefront corresponds to the growing aster periphery. To correct for photobleaching, dextran profiles were normalized to the intensity at the point farthest from the MTOC.
	Figure 8. Unlike organelles, artificial cargoes functionalized with dynein move at constant speed throughout asters.(A) Artificial cargoes were functionalized with an antibody against the dynein adapter HOOK2, and negative control beads were functionalized with random antibody (see Video 12). (B) Max intensity projections of beads functionalized with anti-HOOK2 (red) or random antibody (green). (C) Trajectories of anti-HOOK2 and negative control beads relative to the MTOC. The growing aster is indicated by the blue region. Anti-HOOK2 beads started to be transported when they were engulfed by the growing aster. (D) Velocity distribution of anti-HOOK2 beads inside the aster. (E–H) Similar experiment with F-actin fragmented by Cytochalasin D.Figure 8—source data 1. Bead trajectories for panels C, D, G, and H.The ‘beads’ variables are structures that contain the bead trajectories in XY, as well as the distance from the MTOC at the aster center. The ‘TinsideAster’ variables are the time index at which beads first enter the aster, which was used to generate the velocity distributions in panels D and H.
	Figure 9. Model for component flows during aster separation movement in frog eggs.Within moving asters, all cytoplasmic networks move together, advecting cytosol. Near the aster periphery, organelles flow rapidly inwards while MTs flow outwards. Outside the aster, cytosol is displaced around asters and into the midplane by hydrodynamic forces.

Basant, Spatiotemporal Regulation of RhoA during Cytokinesis. 2018, Pubmed

Basant, Spatiotemporal Regulation of RhoA during Cytokinesis. 2018, Pubmed
Behrndt, Forces driving epithelial spreading in zebrafish gastrulation. 2012, Pubmed
Carmena, The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC): from easy rider to the godfather of mitosis. 2012, Pubmed
Cheng, Spontaneous emergence of cell-like organization in Xenopus egg extracts. 2019, Pubmed , Xenbase
Colin, Actin-Network Architecture Regulates Microtubule Dynamics. 2018, Pubmed , Xenbase
Culbertson, Diffusion coefficient measurements in microfluidic devices. 2002, Pubmed
de Laat, The action of cytochalasin B during egg cleavage in Xenopus laevis: dependence on cell membrane permeability. 1973, Pubmed , Xenbase
Deneke, Self-Organized Nuclear Positioning Synchronizes the Cell Cycle in Drosophila Embryos. 2019, Pubmed
Desai, Preparation and characterization of caged fluorescein tubulin. 1998, Pubmed , Xenbase
Dogterom, Actin-microtubule crosstalk in cell biology. 2019, Pubmed
Elinson, Cytoplasmic phases in the first cell cycle of the activated frog egg. 1983, Pubmed , Xenbase
Faire, E-MAP-115 (ensconsin) associates dynamically with microtubules in vivo and is not a physiological modulator of microtubule dynamics. 1999, Pubmed
Field, Bulk cytoplasmic actin and its functions in meiosis and mitosis. 2011, Pubmed
Field, Actin behavior in bulk cytoplasm is cell cycle regulated in early vertebrate embryos. 2011, Pubmed , Xenbase
Field, Disassembly of Actin and Keratin Networks by Aurora B Kinase at the Midplane of Cleaving Xenopus laevis Eggs. 2019, Pubmed , Xenbase
Field, Spindle-to-cortex communication in cleaving, polyspermic Xenopus eggs. 2015, Pubmed , Xenbase
Field, Xenopus extract approaches to studying microtubule organization and signaling in cytokinesis. 2017, Pubmed , Xenbase
Garzon-Coral, A force-generating machinery maintains the spindle at the cell center during mitosis. 2016, Pubmed
Grill, Spindle positioning by cortical pulling forces. 2005, Pubmed
Groen, Purification and Fluorescent Labeling of Tubulin from Xenopus laevis Egg Extracts. 2016, Pubmed , Xenbase
Guo, Visualizing Intracellular Organelle and Cytoskeletal Interactions at Nanoscale Resolution on Millisecond Timescales. 2018, Pubmed
Gurel, Connecting the cytoskeleton to the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi. 2014, Pubmed
Hamaguchi, Analysis of the Role of Astral Rays in Pronuclear Migration in Sand Dollar Eggs by the Colcemid-UV Method: (sperm aster/pronuclear migration/sand dollar/colcemid-UV method). 1986, Pubmed
Hara, Dynein-Based Accumulation of Membranes Regulates Nuclear Expansion in Xenopus laevis Egg Extracts. 2015, Pubmed , Xenbase
Ishihara, Physical basis of large microtubule aster growth. 2016, Pubmed , Xenbase
Ishihara, Microtubule nucleation remote from centrosomes may explain how asters span large cells. 2014, Pubmed , Xenbase
Kimura, Intracellular organelles mediate cytoplasmic pulling force for centrosome centration in the Caenorhabditis elegans early embryo. 2011, Pubmed
King, Analysis of the dynein-dynactin interaction in vitro and in vivo. 2003, Pubmed
Kotak, Mechanisms of spindle positioning: cortical force generators in the limelight. 2013, Pubmed
Lane, Microtubule-based endoplasmic reticulum motility in Xenopus laevis: activation of membrane-associated kinesin during development. 1999, Pubmed , Xenbase
Luby-Phelps, Cytoarchitecture and physical properties of cytoplasm: volume, viscosity, diffusion, intracellular surface area. 2000, Pubmed
Malik-Garbi, Scaling behaviour in steady-state contracting actomyosin networks. 2019, Pubmed , Xenbase
Mandato, Actomyosin transports microtubules and microtubules control actomyosin recruitment during Xenopus oocyte wound healing. 2003, Pubmed , Xenbase
Mayer, Anisotropies in cortical tension reveal the physical basis of polarizing cortical flows. 2010, Pubmed
Meaders, Microtubule-Based Mechanisms of Pronuclear Positioning. 2020, Pubmed
Miller, Preparation of microtubule protein and purified tubulin from bovine brain by cycles of assembly and disassembly and phosphocellulose chromatography. 2010, Pubmed
Mitchison, Caged fluorescent probes. 1998, Pubmed
Mitchison, Implications of a poroelastic cytoplasm for the dynamics of animal cell shape. 2008, Pubmed
Moeendarbary, The cytoplasm of living cells behaves as a poroelastic material. 2013, Pubmed
Mooney, Tau-based fluorescent protein fusions to visualize microtubules. 2017, Pubmed , Xenbase
Moorhouse, Influence of cell polarity on early development of the sea urchin embryo. 2015, Pubmed
Murray, Cell cycle extracts. 1991, Pubmed
Nazockdast, Cytoplasmic flows as signatures for the mechanics of mitotic positioning. 2017, Pubmed
Nguyen, Spatial organization of cytokinesis signaling reconstituted in a cell-free system. 2014, Pubmed , Xenbase
Palenzuela, In Vitro Reconstitution of Dynein Force Exertion in a Bulk Viscous Medium. 2020, Pubmed
Reck-Peterson, The cytoplasmic dynein transport machinery and its many cargoes. 2018, Pubmed
Redwine, The human cytoplasmic dynein interactome reveals novel activators of motility. 2017, Pubmed
Riedl, Lifeact: a versatile marker to visualize F-actin. 2008, Pubmed
Rodriguez, Conserved microtubule-actin interactions in cell movement and morphogenesis. 2003, Pubmed
Saiki Hamaguchi, FERTILIZATION PROCESS IN THE HEART-URCHIN, CLYPEASTER JAPONICUS OBSERVED WITH A DIFFERENTIAL INTERFERENCE MICROSCOPE. 1980, Pubmed
Sallé, Asymmetric division through a reduction of microtubule centering forces. 2019, Pubmed
Sampath, The chromosomal passenger complex is required for chromatin-induced microtubule stabilization and spindle assembly. 2004, Pubmed , Xenbase
Schindelin, Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. 2012, Pubmed
Schonegg, Timing and mechanism of the initial cue establishing handed left–right asymmetry in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. 2014, Pubmed
Semenova, Actin dynamics is essential for myosin-based transport of membrane organelles. 2008, Pubmed , Xenbase
Sonnett, Accurate, Sensitive, and Precise Multiplexed Proteomics Using the Complement Reporter Ion Cluster. 2018, Pubmed
Tanimoto, Physical Forces Determining the Persistency and Centering Precision of Microtubule Asters. 2018, Pubmed
Tanimoto, Shape-motion relationships of centering microtubule asters. 2016, Pubmed
Telley, Aster migration determines the length scale of nuclear separation in the Drosophila syncytial embryo. 2012, Pubmed
Terasaki, Organization of the sea urchin egg endoplasmic reticulum and its reorganization at fertilization. 1991, Pubmed
Tsai, Aurora A kinase-coated beads function as microtubule-organizing centers and enhance RanGTP-induced spindle assembly. 2005, Pubmed , Xenbase
Valentine, Mechanical properties of Xenopus egg cytoplasmic extracts. 2005, Pubmed , Xenbase
von Dassow, Action at a distance during cytokinesis. 2009, Pubmed , Xenbase
Wang, Multiple mechanisms determine ER network morphology during the cell cycle in Xenopus egg extracts. 2013, Pubmed , Xenbase
Wang, Cooperation of the ER-shaping proteins atlastin, lunapark, and reticulons to generate a tubular membrane network. 2016, Pubmed , Xenbase
Waterman-Storer, Membrane/microtubule tip attachment complexes (TACs) allow the assembly dynamics of plus ends to push and pull membranes into tubulovesicular networks in interphase Xenopus egg extracts. 1995, Pubmed , Xenbase
Waterman-Storer, Endoplasmic reticulum membrane tubules are distributed by microtubules in living cells using three distinct mechanisms. 1998, Pubmed
Waterman-Storer, Microtubules remodel actomyosin networks in Xenopus egg extracts via two mechanisms of F-actin transport. 2000, Pubmed , Xenbase
Wühr, A model for cleavage plane determination in early amphibian and fish embryos. 2010, Pubmed , Xenbase
Wühr, Deep proteomics of the Xenopus laevis egg using an mRNA-derived reference database. 2014, Pubmed , Xenbase
Xie, Cytoskeleton Force Exertion in Bulk Cytoplasm. 2020, Pubmed
Xu, An FTS/Hook/p107(FHIP) complex interacts with and promotes endosomal clustering by the homotypic vacuolar protein sorting complex. 2008, Pubmed