Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Cancer treatment is still challenging because the disease is often caused by multiple mutations. Although genomic studies have identified many oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, gene sets involved in tumorigenesis remain poorly understood. Xenopus, a genus of aquatic frogs, is a useful model to identify gene sets because it can be genetically and experimentally analyzed. Here, we analyzed gene expression in tumor tissues of three individuals in Xenopus tropicalis and identified 55 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Gene ontology (GO) analysis showed that the upregulated genes in the tumor tissues were enriched in GO terms related to the extracellular matrix and collagen fibril organization. Hierarchical clustering showed that the gene expression patterns of tumor tissues in X. tropicalis were comparable to those of human connective, soft, and subcutaneous tissue-derived cancers. Additionally, pathway analysis revealed that these DEGs were associated with multiple pathways, including the extracellular matrix, collagen fibril organization, MET signaling, and keratan sulfate. We also found that the expression tendency of some DEGs that have not been well analyzed in the cancer field clearly determines the prognosis of human cancer patients. This study provides a remarkable reference for future experimental work on X. tropicalis to identify gene sets involved in human cancer.
Figure 1
External view and histological analysis of X. tropicalis tumors. (a,b) External view of NH-III-4 and NH-V-1 tumor individuals. Arrowheads indicate the tumors. (a’,b’) Enlarged view of the tumors. Scale bar indicates 2 mm (a’,b’). (c) Histological analysis of normal tissue, stained by HE. Skin is composed of the epidermis (E) and dermis, which is subdivided into the dense regular connective tissue (C.T.) (arrow), dense irregular C.T. (arrow) and loose C.T. (L). Arrowheads indicate the pigment. The pigment adjacent to the epidermis is commonly referred to as the chromatophore. GG, granular gland; MG, mucous gland. (d,e) Histological analysis of tumors of NH-III-4 (d) and NH-V-1 (e). Arrowheads in (d,e) indicate the pigment. Scale bar indicates 100 μm (c–e).
Figure 2
Hierarchical clustering of all analyzed tumors in Xenopus and DEGs of TT-body1-3 vs TI-leg1-3. (a) Hierarchical clustering of 12 analyzed samples. Difference of the expression patten among the samples was indicated with a tree diagram. (b) Schematic diagram of extraction of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in Xenopus, which we analyzed in this study. (c,d) Schematic diagram of DEGs extraction (TT-body1-3 vs TI-leg1-3) (c) and the MA plot (d). Green dots indicate DEGs with statistical significance (FDR < 0.05) in (d). (e,f) Schematic diagram of DEGs extraction (NI-body1-3 vs NI-leg1-3) (e), and the MA plot (f). Orange dots indicate DEGs with statistical significance (FDR < 0.05) in (f). (g) Venn diagram showing DEG3. DEG3 is DEG1—DEG1 ∩ DEG2.
Figure 3
GO analysis of up- or down-regulated genes of DEG4. GO analysis of upregulated genes (a) or downregulated genes (b). Bar plots represents number of genes involved in each term. Adjusted p-value was represented by color scale, and the statistically significance level decreased from red (higher significance) to blue (lower significance).
Figure 4
DEGs of TT-body1-3 vs NI-body1-3. (a,b) Schematic diagram of DEGs extraction (TT-body1-3 vs NI-body1-3) (a) and the MA plot (b). (c,d) Schematic diagram of DEGs extraction (TI-leg1-3 vs NI-leg1-3) (c) and the MA plot (d). Red (b) and pink (d) dots indicate DEGs with statistical significance (FDR < 0.05). (e) Venn diagram showing DEG7. DEG7 is DEG5—DEG5 ∩ DEG6.
Figure 5
GO analysis of DEG8 and DEG10 genes. GO analysis of upregulated genes (a) or downregulated genes (b) of DEG8. Bar plots represents number of genes involved in each term. Adjusted p-value was represented by color scale, and the statistically significance level decreased from red (higher significance) to blue (lower significance). (c) Venn diagram showing DEG9, which is common genes of DEG3 and DEG7. (d) GO analysis of upregulated genes of DEG10.
Figure 6
MA plot comparing gene expression pattern of cancer tissues with that of normal tissues in human. (a,b) MA plot of cancer tissue vs normal tissue derived from bonetissue (a) and connective tissues, subcutaneous tissue, and other soft tissues (b) in human. Blue (a) and purple (b) dots indicate DEGs with statistical significance (FDR < 0.05). (c,d) Venn diagram of the extraction of DEG13 (c) and DEG14 (d).
Figure 7
GO analysis of DEG11 and DEG12 genes. (a,b) GO analysis of upregulated genes (a) or downregulated genes (b) of DEG11. (c,d) GO analysis of upregulated genes (a) or downregulated genes (b) of DEG12. Bar plots represents number of genes involved in each term. Adjusted p-value was represented by color scale, and the statistically significance level decreased from red (higher significance) to blue (lower significance).
Figure 8
Reactome Pathway Analysis of genes of DEG10. Bar plots represents number of DEGs involved in each term. Adjusted p-value was represented by color scale, and the statistically significance level decreased from red (higher significance) to blue (lower significance).
Bozic,
Accumulation of driver and passenger mutations during tumor progression.
2010, Pubmed
Bozic,
Accumulation of driver and passenger mutations during tumor progression.
2010,
Pubmed
Chen,
LUM Expression and Its Prognostic Significance in Gastric Cancer.
2020,
Pubmed
Dwivedi,
Survival Genie, a web platform for survival analysis across pediatric and adult cancers.
2022,
Pubmed
Emms,
OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics.
2019,
Pubmed
Emms,
OrthoFinder: solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy.
2015,
Pubmed
Fearon,
A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis.
1990,
Pubmed
Ford,
Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.
1998,
Pubmed
Gandini,
Tobacco smoking and cancer: a meta-analysis.
2008,
Pubmed
Greven,
Mechanical properties of the skin of Xenopus laevis (Anura, Amphibia).
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Han,
CRISPR screens in cancer spheroids identify 3D growth-specific vulnerabilities.
2020,
Pubmed
Han,
Hypermethylated PODN represses the progression of osteosarcoma by inactivating the TGF-β/Smad2/3 pathway.
2022,
Pubmed
Hanahan,
Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.
2011,
Pubmed
Igawa,
Inbreeding Ratio and Genetic Relationships among Strains of the Western Clawed Frog, Xenopus tropicalis.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Jinek,
A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity.
2012,
Pubmed
Kayed,
BGLAP is expressed in pancreatic cancer cells and increases their growth and invasion.
2007,
Pubmed
Kim,
Impact of similarity metrics on single-cell RNA-seq data clustering.
2019,
Pubmed
Kim,
HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements.
2015,
Pubmed
Li,
The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools.
2009,
Pubmed
Liu,
Detection of critical genes associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer via integrated bioinformatics analyses.
2020,
Pubmed
Maza,
In Papyro Comparison of TMM (edgeR), RLE (DESeq2), and MRN Normalization Methods for a Simple Two-Conditions-Without-Replicates RNA-Seq Experimental Design.
2016,
Pubmed
Mentzel,
Malignant dermatofibroma: clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of seven cases.
2013,
Pubmed
Nakayama,
Cas9-based genome editing in Xenopus tropicalis.
2014,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Nikitovic,
Lumican, a small leucine-rich proteoglycan.
2008,
Pubmed
Okada,
Expression of the amelogenin gene in the skin of Xenopus tropicalis.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Palladino-Davis,
Dietary habits and esophageal cancer.
2015,
Pubmed
Pertea,
StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads.
2015,
Pubmed
Qiao,
COL6A6 inhibits the proliferation and metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer through the JAK signalling pathway.
2021,
Pubmed
Rumgay,
Alcohol and Cancer: Epidemiology and Biological Mechanisms.
2021,
Pubmed
Sondka,
The COSMIC Cancer Gene Census: describing genetic dysfunction across all human cancers.
2018,
Pubmed
Su,
TCC-GUI: a Shiny-based application for differential expression analysis of RNA-Seq count data.
2019,
Pubmed
Sun,
TCC: an R package for comparing tag count data with robust normalization strategies.
2013,
Pubmed
Suntsova,
Atlas of RNA sequencing profiles for normal human tissues.
2019,
Pubmed
Suzuki,
Spontaneous neoplasia in the western clawed frog Xenopus tropicalis.
2020,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Tang,
Evaluation of methods for differential expression analysis on multi-group RNA-seq count data.
2015,
Pubmed
Taylor,
Chemical and morphological studies on inorganic phosphate deposits in Rana catesbeiana skin.
1966,
Pubmed
Wong,
AMPD3 is associated with the malignant characteristics of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
2017,
Pubmed
Yu,
ReactomePA: an R/Bioconductor package for reactome pathway analysis and visualization.
2016,
Pubmed
Yu,
clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters.
2012,
Pubmed
Zhang,
The Effect of Extracellular Superoxide Dismutase (SOD3) Gene in Lung Cancer.
2022,
Pubmed
Zhou,
Genes That Predict Poor Prognosis in Breast Cancer via Bioinformatical Analysis.
2021,
Pubmed