|
FIGURE 1 Adult Xenopus and human skin. (a) Schematic representation of the skin of Xenopus. (b, c) Morphology of adult Xenopus (b) and human (c) skin with white lines demarcating epidermis (Ep), dermis (De) and hypodermis (Hd). A smaller mucous (Mu) and larger granular (Gr) gland and melanocytes (Mel) are indicated in (b). Stratum germinativum (SG), Stratum spinosum (SSp) and Stratum corneum (Sco) are indicated. Human sebaceous glands (SG), sweat glands (SW) and hair follicle (HF) are indicated in C. Reproduced with permission from Meier 2013. PLoS One 8, e73596. Public Library of Science.
|
|
FIGURE 2
Architecture of the epidermis of Xenopus embryo. (a) Schematic representation of dorsal embryo skin. (b) Schematic representation of the epidermis in a transverse section with ciliated cells, ionocytes, goblet cells and small secretory cells (SSCs). Otogelin-like is a major secretory glycoprotein produced by goblet cells and SSCs. Goblet cells also secrete the epidermal lectin (Xeel). SCs cells also secrete substrates that have not yet been identified. Additionally, secretions contain innate defense molecules such as vitellogenin, apolipoprotein β, complement factors (C3 and C9) and FCGBP/FCGBP-like proteins. The image was created with the aid of BioRender. (c) Ultrastructure of the epidermis. View of the mucociliary epithelium including a ciliated cell and several goblet cells. Reproduced with permission from Hayes 2007. Developmental Biology, 312, 115–130, Elsevier.
|
|
FIGURE 3
Pigment cell in Xenopus embryo at different developmental stages. (a) Development of X. laevis embryos from the fertilized egg to 3-day-old tadpole. (b) Lateral view of a stage 33/34 embryo. (c) Lateral view of a stage 42 embryo. (d) Dorsal view of stage 48 embryo head. (e) Lateral region of stage 48 tadpole showing the dendritic aspect of melanocytes. Scale bar 1 mm in b, c and d and 250 μm in e. Personal communication.
|
|
FIGURE 4
Xenopus melanogenesis. Upper part, the vertebrate melanocyte lineage. Melanoblasts originating from SOX10 neural crest progenitor express MITF and differentiate into melanocytes that express melanin biosynthesis enzymes DCT, TYR and TYRP1. Lower part, gene expression of mitf (a), tyrosinase (b) and dct (c) in Xenopus embryo revealed by in situ hybridization. Expression of the corresponding genes is indicated by an arrowhead. Personal communication.
|
|
|
|
|
|
tyr (tyrosinase) gene expression in Xenopus laevis embryo, assayed via in situ hybridization, NF stage 28-29, lateral view, anterior left, dorsal up.
|
|
FIGURE 1. Adult Xenopus and human skin. (a) Schematic representation of the skin of Xenopus. (b, c) Morphology of adult Xenopus (b) and human (c) skin with white lines demarcating epidermis (Ep), dermis (De) and hypodermis (Hd). A smaller mucous (Mu) and larger granular (Gr) gland and melanocytes (Mel) are indicated in (b). Stratum germinativum (SG), Stratum spinosum (SSp) and Stratum corneum (Sco) are indicated. Human sebaceous glands (SG), sweat glands (SW) and hair follicle (HF) are indicated in C. Reproduced with permission from Meier 2013. PLoS One 8, e73596. Public Library of Science.
|
|
FIGURE 2. Architecture of the epidermis of Xenopus embryo. (a) Schematic representation of dorsal embryo skin. (b) Schematic representation of the epidermis in a transverse section with ciliated cells, ionocytes, goblet cells and small secretory cells (SSCs). Otogelin‐like is a major secretory glycoprotein produced by goblet cells and SSCs. Goblet cells also secrete the epidermal lectin (Xeel). SCs cells also secrete substrates that have not yet been identified. Additionally, secretions contain innate defense molecules such as vitellogenin, apolipoprotein β, complement factors (C3 and C9) and FCGBP/FCGBP‐like proteins. The image was created with the aid of BioRender. (c) Ultrastructure of the epidermis. View of the mucociliary epithelium including a ciliated cell and several goblet cells. Reproduced with permission from Hayes 2007. Developmental Biology, 312, 115–130, Elsevier.
|
|
FIGURE 3. Pigment cell in Xenopus embryo at different developmental stages. (a) Development of X. laevis embryos from the fertilized egg to 3‐day‐old tadpole. (b) Lateral view of a stage 33/34 embryo. (c) Lateral view of a stage 42 embryo. (d) Dorsal view of stage 48 embryo head. (e) Lateral region of stage 48 tadpole showing the dendritic aspect of melanocytes. Scale bar 1 mm in b, c and d and 250 μm in e. Personal communication.
|
|
FIGURE 4.
Xenopus melanogenesis. Upper part, the vertebrate melanocyte lineage. Melanoblasts originating from SOX10 neural crest progenitor express MITF and differentiate into melanocytes that express melanin biosynthesis enzymes DCT, TYR and TYRP1. Lower part, gene expression of mitf (a), tyrosinase (b) and dct (c) in Xenopus embryo revealed by in situ hybridization. Expression of the corresponding genes is indicated by an arrowhead. Personal communication.
|
|
FIGURE 5. Examples of pigment modification in stage 42 Xenopus embryo after different treatments. (a) Untreated control embryo. (b) Total pigment loss phenotype upon treatment with NSC86153 compound. (c) Segmented pattern on the dorsal side upon treatment with NSC84093 compound. (d–f) Effect of sex steroids on the epidermal pigmented area of tadpoles in the presence of increased estradiol treatment (+E2 and ++E2). (g, h) Maltol treatment (H, +Maltol) of embryo stimulates melanocyte aggregation compared to untreated control embryo (G). (i, j) Inhibition of melanocyte migration in endothelin‐3 signaling depleted embryo (j, −ET3) compared to control embryo. (k, l) Embryos grown in the light versus dark exhibit distinct pigmentation of their head. (b, c) Reproduced with permission from Tomlinson 2009 Mol.BiolSyst 5376–384, The Royal Society of Chemistry Publishing. (d–f) Reproduced with permission from Castillo‐Briceno 2014, Fontiers in zoology 11:9, Springer Nature. (g, h) Reproduced with permission from Dahora, Environ Toxicol Chem 39(2), 381–395, John Wyley & Sons. (i, j) Reproduced with permission from Yamamoto 2011 Dev Dyn 240, 1454–1466, John Wyley & Sons. (k, l) Reproduced with permission from Bertolesi 2016 Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 29, 688–70, John Wiley & Sons.
|
|
FIGURE 6.
Xenopus embryo as a model for ultraviolet radiation (UVR) response. (a–c) Phenotypic aspect of melanocytes 5 and 10 min after UVR compared to non‐irradiated (NIR) control embryo. Red arrowhead marks a melanocyte with dendritic extension induced by UVR. (d) Histological transverse section of an embryo stained by hematoxylin–eosin showing epiderm thickening after UVR, IR irradiated side, NIR non irradiated control side. Red arrowheads marks the regions enlarged views shown in E and F. (e,f) Enlargement of the irradiated side epiderm (IR, left) versus nonirradiated side (NIR, right) stained by hematoxylin–eosin (e) or immunostained with anti‐keratin 2 (KER) antibody (f). (g) Immunostaining analysis of a histological section at the level of the head of a stage 42 irradiated embryo. CPDs (red arrow) are found on the irradiated side (IR) but absent from the nonirradiated side (NIR). Br, brain. Reproduced with permission from El Mir 2023, Dev Growth Differ. 65, 194–202. John Wiley & Sons.
|