Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.
XB-IMG-137007

Xenbase Image ID: 137007


Figure 2. MPC088 agonist activity in oocytes expressing α1β2γ2 GABAARsa: Representative responses to MPC088 obtained in a single experiment. b: Concentration-response functions (mean ± SD) for trans- and cis-dominant MPC088 (n = 6) and propofol (n = 6). In each of the MPC088 experiments, the cis-dominant form was generated by UV light during static bathing. Amplitudes normalized to the 100 μM GABA response. Inset: Sensitivity (mean ± SD) of the MPC088 (15 μM) response to 100 μM PTX (n = 4), 100 μM bicuculline (n = 4) and 30 μM gabazine (n = 4). c: Photo-regulation of the response to 15 μM MPC088. d: Normalized current amplitudes (mean ± SD) determined in the experiment of c and in 3 others of similar design. Amplitudes in each experiment normalized to that elicited by 3 μM GABA. Numbers beneath the waveform in c denote amplitude determination conditions for the experiment shown in c. Repeated-measures ANOVA conducted on the aggregate data yielded F(6,18) = 68.988, p < 0.001. Post-hoc paired-sample t-tests corrected for multiple comparisons indicated significant differences produced by the initial UV, the initial High-Vis, the second UV, and the second High-Vis illuminations (p ≤ 0.010 for amplitude group 2 vs. group 1, for 4 vs. 3, for 5 vs. 4, and for 6 vs. 5, respectively); amplitude groups 7 and 1 did not differ significantly (p = 0.96). e: Representative waveform obtained with repeated presentation of UV light during continuous High-Vis illumination (static bathing in MPC088-supplemented Ringer).

Image published in: Yue L et al. (2012)

Image downloaded from an Open Access article in PubMed Central. Image reproduced on Xenbase with permission of the publisher and the copyright holder.

Larger Image
Printer Friendly View

Return to previous page