Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
PLoS One
2014 Jan 01;99:e107406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107406.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Effect of cytosolic pH on inward currents reveals structural characteristics of the proton transport cycle in the influenza A protein M2 in cell-free membrane patches of Xenopus oocytes.
DiFrancesco ML
,
Hansen UP
,
Thiel G
,
Moroni A
,
Schroeder I
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Transport activity through the mutant D44A of the M2 proton channel from influenza virus A was measured in excised inside-out macro-patches of Xenopus laevis oocytes at cytosolic pH values of 5.5, 7.5 and 8.2. The current-voltage relationships reveal some peculiarities: 1. "Transinhibition", i.e., instead of an increase of unidirectional outward current with increasing cytosolic H(+) concentration, a decrease of unidirectional inward current was found. 2. Strong inward rectification. 3. Exponential rise of current with negative potentials. In order to interpret these findings in molecular terms, different kinetic models have been tested. The transinhibition basically results from a strong binding of H(+) to a site in the pore, presumably His37. This assumption alone already provides inward rectification and exponential rise of the IV curves. However, it results in poor global fits of the IV curves, i.e., good fits were only obtained for cytosolic pH of 8.2, but not for 7.5. Assuming an additional transport step as e.g. caused by a constriction zone at Val27 resulted in a negligible improvement. In contrast, good global fits for cytosolic pH of 7.5 and 8.2 were immediately obtained with a cyclic model. A "recycling step" implies that the protein undergoes conformational changes (assigned to Trp41 and Val27) during transport which have to be reset before the next proton can be transported. The global fit failed at the low currents at pHcyt = 5.5, as expected from the interference of putative transport of other ions besides H(+). Alternatively, a regulatory effect of acidic cytosolic pH may be assumed which strongly modifies the rate constants of the transport cycle.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink???
25211283
???displayArticle.pmcLink???PMC4174909 ???displayArticle.link???PLoS One
Figure 2. Activation of M2D44A by external acidification.Representative currents obtained from water- or M2D44A-injected Xenopus oocytes were recorded at â20 mV in TEVC. External pH was changed and amantadine added as a blocker as indicated by the bars. The internal pH was that of the oocyte, about pH 7.4.
Figure 3. Dependence of currents on cytosolic pH in cell-free macro-patches.Representative traces are shown from (A) water-injected oocytes and (B) M2D44A-injected oocytes. The pH values are given at the traces. The averaged IV curves from patches clamped to test voltages between â100 mV to +100 mV are shown in (C) for H2Oâ and (D) for M2D44A-injected oocytes. The current traces at high negative membrane potentials (B) were noisy. However, the IV curves obtained after averaging show a smooth behavior at high negative potentials (D). The individual data is given in Table S1 in file S2.
Figure 4. Averaged IV curves of M2D44A obtained from macro-patches at different cytosolic pH: 5.5 (squares), 7.5 (circles) and 8.2 (triangles) (nâ=â2, 3, 3, respectively).The error bars give the standard deviation of the measured data points. The external pH was 5.5. Averaged IV curves from water-injected oocytes (different pH values were measured on each control oocyte) have been subtracted from the original IV curves measured in patches expressing M2D44A (nâ=â5â7 per pH value) in order to isolate the M2 current from the endogenous currents. The data for pHcytâ=â7.5 and 8.2 was fitted with the linear model with a strongly binding residue (enzyme model) in the pore (Eqs. 2 and 3). Voltage acts on the B-O transitions (Eqs. 4b, c). Cytosolic H+ binds to the U-B transition kCB (Eq. 4a). Since the fit is not perfect, in particular for the data at pH 7.5, the full equations used for fitting are not given here, but in Eq. S4 in file S1).
Figure 5. Reaction schemes for the dependence of proton transport in M2D44A on cytosolic pH.(A) Cyclic reaction with the following states of the M2 protein. O: the external part of the protein has taken up a proton from the external side or is ready to release a proton to the external solution. B: the protein has bound a proton from O via the voltage-sensitive translocation kOB or from C (kCB) and is ready for the voltage-sensitive translocation of this proton to O (kBO) or release to C (kBC), C: the protein is ready to bind a cytosolic proton and transfer it to B with the rate constant kCB or to take a proton from B (kBC) and release it to the internal side. The recycling step O-C includes the resetting of the conformational changes of the protein necessary for the transport of the next proton. It also includes the exchange of a proton with the external solution. (B) Augmented model derived from the structural information as detailed in the Introduction. The meaning of the symbols is as follows: Capital letter: Tâ=âTrp41-basket; Vâ=âVal27-gate, Pâ=âpool in the cavity filled with m or n protons, m>n; small letter oâ=âopen, iâ=âopen, but instable câ=âclosed; Number: Protonation state of the His37-box. The equality sign indicates which state of the augmented model is assigned to a state in the model in (A). The solid boxes include reactions, which are merged to gross reactions in (A) as explained in file S1. The dotted box indicates the gross reaction kMC and kCM used in the recycling branch of the model in (C). (C) The recycling pathway with the gross rate constants κOC and κCO of (A) is split up into two steps: O-M with external proton binding kMO (and release kOM), and recycling (M-C) with the gross rate constants kMC and kCM as indicated by the dotted box in (B).
Figure 6. Fit of the data of Fig. 4 with the cyclic reaction scheme.The lines give the fits by means of Eqs. S13âS15 in file S1. For pH 5.5, two fits are shown: red curve: joint fit with curves for cytosolic pH of 7.5 and 8.2, black curve: without the restriction by the joint fit. This is illustrated by two different âfreeâ fits at pH 5.5 (Table 1, data columns 4 and 5), which show that different sets of rate constants can fit the curve.
Figure 7. Properties of the M2D44A transport cycle as calculated from the cyclic model in Fig. 5A.(A) Occupation probabilities of the three states in the model and their dependence on membrane potential V and cytosolic pHcyt. (B) Unidirectional currents Iinâ=ââf O kOB (red) and Ioutâ=âf B kBO (blue, pH 7.5 and 8.2 coincide) and their dependence of membrane potential V and cytosolic pHcyt. The inset shows the unidirectional outward currents on an expanded scale.
Figure 8. Calculated IV curves for different external pH of 5.5, 6.5 and 7.5.The parameters in Table 1 from the joint fit for pHcytâ=â8.2 with κCO modified by pHext (Eq. 6) were used to generate the curves; pHext is given at the curves. For comparison, triangles show the experimental data of Fig. 6 for pHcytâ=â8.2/pHextâ=â5.5.
Figure 1. Structure of the M2 protein and its orientation during infection.Coordinates were taken from [15], pbd access code 3lbw. The image was created with the UCSF Chimera package [67], which is developed by the Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics at the University of California, San Francisco (supported by NIGMS P41-GM103311). In the present experimental setting, in which the M2 protein is expressed in Xenopus oocytes, the endosomal side corresponds to the external medium and the side facing to the interior of the virus particle corresponds to the âcytosolicâ side. The critical residues Val27 (green), His37 (blue) and Trp41 (red) are shown explicitly.
Abenavoli,
Fast and slow gating are inherent properties of the pore module of the K+ channel Kcv.
2009, Pubmed,
Xenbase
Abenavoli,
Fast and slow gating are inherent properties of the pore module of the K+ channel Kcv.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Abramson,
Structure and mechanism of the lactose permease of Escherichia coli.
2003,
Pubmed
Acharya,
Structure and mechanism of proton transport through the transmembrane tetrameric M2 protein bundle of the influenza A virus.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Balannik,
Functional studies and modeling of pore-lining residue mutants of the influenza a virus M2 ion channel.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Cady,
Structure of the amantadine binding site of influenza M2 proton channels in lipid bilayers.
2010,
Pubmed
Chizhmakov,
Selective proton permeability and pH regulation of the influenza virus M2 channel expressed in mouse erythroleukaemia cells.
1996,
Pubmed
Chizhmakov,
Differences in conductance of M2 proton channels of two influenza viruses at low and high pH.
2003,
Pubmed
Das,
Structures of influenza A proteins and insights into antiviral drug targets.
2010,
Pubmed
Dencher,
Structural changes in bacteriorhodopsin during proton translocation revealed by neutron diffraction.
1989,
Pubmed
Gradmann,
Reaction kinetic parameters for ion transport from steady-state current-voltage curves.
1987,
Pubmed
Gradmann,
Rectification of the channelrhodopsin early conductance.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Grambas,
Influence of amantadine resistance mutations on the pH regulatory function of the M2 protein of influenza A viruses.
1992,
Pubmed
Hansen,
Interpretation of current-voltage relationships for "active" ion transport systems: I. Steady-state reaction-kinetic analysis of class-I mechanisms.
1981,
Pubmed
Hansen,
Interpretation of current-voltage relationships for "active" ion transport systems: II. Nonsteady-state reaction kinetic analysis of class-I mechanisms with one slow time-constant.
1983,
Pubmed
Hay,
The molecular basis of the specific anti-influenza action of amantadine.
1985,
Pubmed
Hay,
The matrix protein gene determines amantadine-sensitivity of influenza viruses.
1979,
Pubmed
Hiller,
The functional heart of the M2 channel.
2013,
Pubmed
Hladky,
The mechanism of ion conduction by valinomycin: analysis of charge pulse responses.
1995,
Pubmed
Hong,
Structural basis for proton conduction and inhibition by the influenza M2 protein.
2012,
Pubmed
Hu,
NMR detection of pH-dependent histidine-water proton exchange reveals the conduction mechanism of a transmembrane proton channel.
2012,
Pubmed
Hu,
Mechanisms of proton conduction and gating in influenza M2 proton channels from solid-state NMR.
2010,
Pubmed
Hu,
Histidines, heart of the hydrogen ion channel from influenza A virus: toward an understanding of conductance and proton selectivity.
2006,
Pubmed
Huang,
An in-depth analysis of the biological functional studies based on the NMR M2 channel structure of influenza A virus.
2008,
Pubmed
Ivanovic,
Kinetics of proton transport into influenza virions by the viral M2 channel.
2012,
Pubmed
Jing,
Functional studies indicate amantadine binds to the pore of the influenza A virus M2 proton-selective ion channel.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Khurana,
Molecular dynamics calculations suggest a conduction mechanism for the M2 proton channel from influenza A virus.
2009,
Pubmed
Koch,
Time-resolved X-ray diffraction study of structural changes associated with the photocycle of bacteriorhodopsin.
1991,
Pubmed
Lear,
Proton conduction through the M2 protein of the influenza A virus; a quantitative, mechanistic analysis of experimental data.
2003,
Pubmed
Leiding,
Proton and cation transport activity of the M2 proton channel from influenza A virus.
2010,
Pubmed
Leonov,
Structure and dynamics of the influenza A M2 channel: a comparison of three structures.
2009,
Pubmed
Lin,
Definitive assignment of proton selectivity and attoampere unitary current to the M2 ion channel protein of influenza A virus.
2001,
Pubmed
Ma,
Asp44 stabilizes the Trp41 gate of the M2 proton channel of influenza A virus.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Moffat,
Proton transport through influenza A virus M2 protein reconstituted in vesicles.
2008,
Pubmed
Moukhametzianov,
Development of the signal in sensory rhodopsin and its transfer to the cognate transducer.
2006,
Pubmed
Mould,
Mechanism for proton conduction of the M(2) ion channel of influenza A virus.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Nguyen,
pH-induced conformational change of the influenza M2 protein C-terminal domain.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Perozo,
Structural rearrangements underlying K+-channel activation gating.
1999,
Pubmed
Pettersen,
UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis.
2004,
Pubmed
Pielak,
Solution NMR structure of the V27A drug resistant mutant of influenza A M2 channel.
2010,
Pubmed
Pielak,
Kinetic analysis of the M2 proton conduction of the influenza virus.
2010,
Pubmed
Pinto,
Influenza virus M2 protein has ion channel activity.
1992,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Pinto,
Controlling influenza virus replication by inhibiting its proton channel.
2007,
Pubmed
Pinto,
A functionally defined model for the M2 proton channel of influenza A virus suggests a mechanism for its ion selectivity.
1997,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Plugge,
A potassium channel protein encoded by chlorella virus PBCV-1.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Polishchuk,
A pH-dependent conformational ensemble mediates proton transport through the influenza A/M2 protein.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sansom,
The influenza A virus M2 channel: a molecular modeling and simulation study.
1997,
Pubmed
Schneider,
Ion selectivity and competition in channelrhodopsins.
2013,
Pubmed
Schnell,
Structure and mechanism of the M2 proton channel of influenza A virus.
2008,
Pubmed
Schroeder,
Ca2+ block and flickering both contribute to the negative slope of the IV curve in BK channels.
2013,
Pubmed
Schroeder,
Saturation and microsecond gating of current indicate depletion-induced instability of the MaxiK selectivity filter.
2007,
Pubmed
Sharma,
Insight into the mechanism of the influenza A proton channel from a structure in a lipid bilayer.
2010,
Pubmed
Shimbo,
Ion selectivity and activation of the M2 ion channel of influenza virus.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Shrivastava,
Common mechanism of pore opening shared by five different potassium channels.
2006,
Pubmed
Stouffer,
Structural basis for the function and inhibition of an influenza virus proton channel.
2008,
Pubmed
Takeda,
Influenza a virus M2 ion channel activity is essential for efficient replication in tissue culture.
2002,
Pubmed
Tang,
The gate of the influenza virus M2 proton channel is formed by a single tryptophan residue.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Vijayvergiya,
Proton conductance of influenza virus M2 protein in planar lipid bilayers.
2004,
Pubmed
Wang,
Activation of the M2 ion channel of influenza virus: a role for the transmembrane domain histidine residue.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wei,
Activation and proton transport mechanism in influenza A M2 channel.
2013,
Pubmed
Williams,
Drug-induced conformational and dynamical changes of the S31N mutant of the influenza M2 proton channel investigated by solid-state NMR.
2013,
Pubmed
Yi,
A secondary gate as a mechanism for inhibition of the M2 proton channel by amantadine.
2008,
Pubmed
Zhou,
Mechanistic insight into the h(2)o/d (2)o isotope effect in the proton transport of the influenza virus m2 protein.
2011,
Pubmed
Zhou,
A theory for the proton transport of the influenza virus M2 protein: extensive test against conductance data.
2011,
Pubmed