Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
J Dev Biol
2022 Sep 10;103:. doi: 10.3390/jdb10030038.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Tissue Rotation of the Xenopus Anterior-Posterior Neural Axis Reveals Profound but Transient Plasticity at the Mid-Gastrula Stage.
Bolkhovitinov L
,
Weselman BT
,
Shaw GA
,
Dong C
,
Giribhattanavar J
,
Saha MS
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The establishment of anterior-posterior (AP) regional identity is an essential step in the appropriate development of the vertebrate central nervous system. An important aspect of AP neural axis formation is the inherent plasticity that allows developing cells to respond to and recover from the various perturbations that embryos continually face during the course of development. While the mechanisms governing the regionalization of the nervous system have been extensively studied, relatively less is known about the nature and limits of early neural plasticity of the anterior-posterior neural axis. This study aims to characterize the degree of neural axis plasticity in Xenopus laevis by investigating the response of embryos to a 180-degree rotation of their AP neural axis during gastrula stages by assessing the expression of regional marker genes using in situ hybridization. Our results reveal the presence of a narrow window of time between the mid- and late gastrula stage, during which embryos are able undergo significant recovery following a 180-degree rotation of their neural axis and eventually express appropriate regional marker genes including Otx, Engrailed, and Krox. By the late gastrula stage, embryos show misregulation of regional marker genes following neural axis rotation, suggesting that this profound axial plasticity is a transient phenomenon that is lost by late gastrula stages.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink???
36135371
???displayArticle.pmcLink???PMC9503425 ???displayArticle.link???J Dev Biol ???displayArticle.grants???[+]
Figure 1. Schematic of experimental design for experiments. Fluorescein-injected donor embryo is on the left and uninjected host embryo is on the right. Dorsal view, with anterior up and posterior down. The precise tissue removed was determined from preliminary fate mapping experiments and published work [54].
Figure 2. Examples of normal versus abnormal embryos. Significant deviations from embryos shown in Nieuwkoop and Faber [53] were regarded as abnormal. Scale bars = 1 mm.
Figure 3. Images showing criteria for discerning between co-localization of gene expression with integrated transplant tissue and endogenous expression. Light blue coloring indicates transplanted tissue and purple coloring indicates Otx2 expression via in situ hybridization. These specific examples are sections from the mid-gastrula sham surgery showing Otx2 expression (left) and the late gastrula sham surgery showing Otx2 expression (right).
Figure 4. Morphology of embryos with transplanted tissues at late neurula (St. 18) (A) and hatching stages (St. 30) (B).
Figure 5. Representative examples of expression of regional marker genes in transplants and sibling controls at late neurula stage (St. 18). With a lateral view with dorsal facing up for XCG-1 and Otx2, and dorsal view for En-2 and Krox20, anterior is to the right in all images. Purple stain marked with a solid arrowhead indicates gene expression and aqua blue stain was used to indicate transplant incorporation. Scale bar represents 1 mm.
Figure 6. Representative histology for transplants at late neurula stage with sibling control comparisons. Dorsal is facing up. The four regional marker genes XCG-1, Otx2, En-2, and Krox20 are expressed at the cement gland, eye and forebrain, midbrain, and rhombomeres 3 and 5 of the hindbrain, respectively. Purple stain marked with a solid arrowhead indicates gene expression colocalized with transplant tissue, purple stain marked with an empty arrowhead indicates endogenous gene expression, and blue stain indicates transplant incorporation. Late gastrula rotated embryos show decreased level and more restricted area of marker gene expression at correct locations compared with mid-gastrula sham and rotated embryos. Scale bar represents 250 µm.
Figure 7. Histology scores for transplants at late neurula stage. Histological sections were scored for expression levels of regional marker genes, both correct “New On” expression (A) and ectopic “Old Off” expression (B). Horizontal black lines represent the mean, and error bars represent the SEM. ** p < 0.01. N for each gene and condition is indicated along the x-axis in gray. Late gastrula rotated embryos have significantly lower levels of correct marker gene expression than mid-gastrula sham embryos (p = 0.0077) and mid-gastrula rotated embryos (p = 0.0018).
Figure 8. Representative examples of expression of regional marker genes in transplants and sibling controls at hatching stage. Lateral view of all embryos with dorsal facing up; anterior is to the right. Purple stain marked with a solid arrowhead indicates gene expression and blue stain indicates transplant incorporation. Scale bar represents 1 mm.
Figure 9. Representative histology for transplants at hatching stage, with sibling control comparisons. Dorsal is facing up. Purple stain marked with a solid arrowhead indicates gene expression colocalized with transplant tissue, purple stain marked with an empty arrowhead indicates endogenous gene expression, and blue stain indicates transplant incorporation. Late gastrula rotated embryos show decreased levels of and more restricted area of marker gene expression at correct places compared with mid-gastrula sham and rotated embryos. Late gastrula rotated embryos also present more ectopic gene expression than mid-gastrula rotated embryos. Scale bar represents 250 µm.
Figure 10. Histology scores for transplants at hatching stage. Histological sections were scored for expression levels of regional marker genes, both correct “New On” expression (A) and ectopic “Old Off” expression (B). Horizontal black lines represent the mean, and error bars represent the SEM. ** p < 0.01. N for each gene and condition is indicated along the x-axis in gray. Late gastrula rotated embryos have significantly less appropriate marker gene expression than mid-gastrula sham (p = 0.0064) and Rotated embryos (p = 0.0012). Late gastrula rotated embryos also have significantly more ectopic marker gene expression (p = 0.0022) than mid-gastrula rotated embryos.
Figure 11. Representative examples of expression of regional marker genes in (A) sibling control embryos, (B) mid-gastrula rotated transplants, and (C) late gastrula rotated embryos at stages 14 to 16. Dorsal view for all embryos, anterior is to the right. Purple stain marked with a solid arrowhead indicates gene expression and blue stain indicates transplant incorporation. Scale bar represents 250 µm.
Figure 12. Representative histology images for sibling control embryos (A), mid-gastrula rotated transplants (B), and late gastrula rotated transplants (C) at stages 14–16. Dorsal is facing up. Purple stain marked with a solid arrowhead indicates gene expression colocalized with transplant tissue, purple stain marked with an empty arrowhead indicates endogenous gene expression, and blue stain indicates transplant incorporation. As embryos develop from stage 14–16, sections showed progressive activation of correct marker gene expression and repression of ectopic marker gene expression. Scale bar represents 250 µm.
Figure 13. Histology scores for mid- and late gastrula rotated transplants at stage 14 to 16. Histological sections were scored for expression levels of regional marker genes, both correct “New On” expression (A) and ectopic “Old Off” expression (B). Horizontal black lines represent the mean, and error bars represent the SEM. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. n = 3 for each stage and gene. For mid-gastrula rotated embryos, stage 15 embryos have significantly higher levels of correct marker gene expression than stage 14 embryos (p = 0.0100), and stage 16 embryos have significantly higher levels of expression than both stage 14 (p < 0.0001) and stage 15 (p = 0.0007) embryos. Stage 16 mid-gastrula rotated embryos also have significantly higher levels of correct marker gene expression than stage 16 late gastrula rotated embryos (p < 0.0001).
,
,
Pubmed
Al Anber,
Transformation of a neural activation and patterning model.
2019,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Beck,
Beyond early development: Xenopus as an emerging model for the study of regenerative mechanisms.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Bedzhov,
Developmental plasticity, cell fate specification and morphogenesis in the early mouse embryo.
2014,
Pubmed
Blum,
Xenopus: An Undervalued Model Organism to Study and Model Human Genetic Disease.
2018,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Borodinsky,
Xenopus laevis as a Model Organism for the Study of Spinal Cord Formation, Development, Function and Regeneration.
2017,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Britton,
A novel self-organizing embryonic stem cell system reveals signaling logic underlying the patterning of human ectoderm.
2019,
Pubmed
Buitrago-Delgado,
NEURODEVELOPMENT. Shared regulatory programs suggest retention of blastula-stage potential in neural crest cells.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Carron,
Specification of anteroposterior axis by combinatorial signaling during Xenopus development.
2016,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Dirscherl,
Neural and eye-specific defects associated with loss of the imitation switch (ISWI) chromatin remodeler in Xenopus laevis.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Dubey,
Anterior patterning genes induced by Zic1 are sensitive to retinoic acid and its metabolite, 4-oxo-RA.
2022,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Exner,
Xenopus leads the way: Frogs as a pioneering model to understand the human brain.
2021,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Fields,
Morphological Coordination: A Common Ancestral Function Unifying Neural and Non-Neural Signaling.
2020,
Pubmed
Fortriede,
Xenbase: deep integration of GEO & SRA RNA-seq and ChIP-seq data in a model organism database.
2020,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Gamse,
Vertebrate anteroposterior patterning: the Xenopus neurectoderm as a paradigm.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Gaur,
Neural transcription factors bias cleavage stage blastomeres to give rise to neural ectoderm.
2016,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Gilbert,
Continuity and change: paradigm shifts in neural induction.
2001,
Pubmed
Girgin,
Gastruloids generated without exogenous Wnt activation develop anterior neural tissues.
2021,
Pubmed
Grapin-Botton,
Plasticity of transposed rhombomeres: Hox gene induction is correlated with phenotypic modifications.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Guthrie,
Neuroectodermal autonomy of Hox-2.9 expression revealed by rhombomere transpositions.
1992,
Pubmed
Guthrie,
Selective dispersal of avian rhombomere cells in orthotopic and heterotopic grafts.
1993,
Pubmed
Hashiguchi,
Anteroposterior and dorsoventral patterning are coordinated by an identical patterning clock.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Itasaki,
Reprogramming Hox expression in the vertebrate hindbrain: influence of paraxial mesoderm and rhombomere transposition.
1996,
Pubmed
JACOBSON,
THE DETERMINATION AND POSITIONING OF THE NOSE, LENS AND EAR. III. EFFECTS OF REVERSING THE ANTERO-POSTERIOR AXIS OF EPIDERMIS, NEURAL PLATE AND NEURAL FOLD.
1963,
Pubmed
Kimelman,
Anterior-posterior patterning in early development: three strategies.
2012,
Pubmed
Kjolby,
Integration of Wnt and FGF signaling in the Xenopus gastrula at TCF and Ets binding sites shows the importance of short-range repression by TCF in patterning the marginal zone.
2019,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Krumlauf,
Segmentation and patterning of the vertebrate hindbrain.
2021,
Pubmed
Kumar,
The Organizer and Its Signaling in Embryonic Development.
2021,
Pubmed
Kuratani,
Rhombomere transplantation repatterns the segmental organization of cranial nerves and reveals cell-autonomous expression of a homeodomain protein.
1993,
Pubmed
Lafuente,
Genomics of Developmental Plasticity in Animals.
2019,
Pubmed
Leung,
Transmembrane H+ fluxes and the regulation of neural induction in Xenopus laevis.
2022,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Mancini,
The dorsal blastopore lip is a source of signals inducing planar cell polarity in the Xenopus neural plate.
2021,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Martinez Arias,
On the nature and function of organizers.
2018,
Pubmed
Martinez Arias,
A molecular basis for developmental plasticity in early mammalian embryos.
2013,
Pubmed
Metzis,
Nervous System Regionalization Entails Axial Allocation before Neural Differentiation.
2018,
Pubmed
Mongera,
Mechanics of Anteroposterior Axis Formation in Vertebrates.
2019,
Pubmed
Moody,
On becoming neural: what the embryo can tell us about differentiating neural stem cells.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Moody,
Corrigendum: Lineage Tracing and Fate Mapping in Xenopus Embryos.
2021,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Moody,
Lineage Tracing and Fate Mapping in Xenopus Embryos.
2018,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Nava,
Heterochromatin-Driven Nuclear Softening Protects the Genome against Mechanical Stress-Induced Damage.
2020,
Pubmed
Nicholas,
RESULTS OF INVERSION OF NEURAL PLATE MATERIAL.
1957,
Pubmed
Niehrs,
Regionally specific induction by the Spemann-Mangold organizer.
2004,
Pubmed
Niehrs,
The role of Xenopus developmental biology in unraveling Wnt signalling and antero-posterior axis formation.
2022,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Parihar,
Retinoic Acid Fluctuation Activates an Uneven, Direction-Dependent Network-Wide Robustness Response in Early Embryogenesis.
2021,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Patel,
Hif1α and Wnt are required for posterior gene expression during Xenopus tropicalis tail regeneration.
2022,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Pera,
Active signals, gradient formation and regional specificity in neural induction.
2014,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Plouhinec,
A molecular atlas of the developing ectoderm defines neural, neural crest, placode, and nonneural progenitor identity in vertebrates.
2017,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Polevoy,
New roles for Wnt and BMP signaling in neural anteroposterior patterning.
2019,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Poznanski,
The role of planar and early vertical signaling in patterning the expression of Hoxb-1 in Xenopus.
1997,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Roellig,
Dynamic transcriptional signature and cell fate analysis reveals plasticity of individual neural plate border cells.
2017,
Pubmed
Rogers,
Neural induction and factors that stabilize a neural fate.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Saha,
A labile period in the determination of the anterior-posterior axis during early neural development in Xenopus.
1992,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Saldivar,
Rhombomere of origin determines autonomous versus environmentally regulated expression of Hoxa-3 in the avian embryo.
1996,
Pubmed
Sasai,
Neural induction: Historical views and application to pluripotent stem cells.
2021,
Pubmed
Sater,
Using Xenopus to understand human disease and developmental disorders.
2017,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Schilling,
Plasticity in zebrafish hox expression in the hindbrain and cranial neural crest.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Seo,
The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling protein Brg1 is required for vertebrate neurogenesis and mediates transactivation of Ngn and NeuroD.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Servetnick,
Changes in neural and lens competence in Xenopus ectoderm: evidence for an autonomous developmental timer.
1991,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Simon,
Independent assignment of antero-posterior and dorso-ventral positional values in the developing chick hindbrain.
1995,
Pubmed
Sive,
Microinjection of RNA and preparation of secreted proteins from Xenopus oocytes.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sive,
Calibration of the injection volume for microinjection of Xenopus oocytes and embryos.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sive,
Microinjection of Xenopus embryos.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sive,
Progressive determination during formation of the anteroposterior axis in Xenopus laevis.
1989,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Skipper,
Plasticity.
2010,
Pubmed
Slack,
Mechanism of anteroposterior axis specification in vertebrates. Lessons from the amphibians.
1992,
Pubmed
Solini,
Embryonic transplantation experiments: Past, present, and future.
2017,
Pubmed
Solini,
Xenopus embryos show a compensatory response following perturbation of the Notch signaling pathway.
2020,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Staudt,
The prethalamus is established during gastrulation and influences diencephalic regionalization.
2007,
Pubmed
Stern,
Neural induction: old problem, new findings, yet more questions.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Szaro,
Regulation in the neural plate of Xenopus laevis demonstrated by genetic markers.
1985,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sztal,
Transcriptional adaptation: a mechanism underlying genetic robustness.
2020,
Pubmed
Takebayashi-Suzuki,
Coordinated regulation of the dorsal-ventral and anterior-posterior patterning of Xenopus embryos by the BTB/POZ zinc finger protein Zbtb14.
2018,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Trevers,
Neural induction by the node and placode induction by head mesoderm share an initial state resembling neural plate border and ES cells.
2018,
Pubmed
Tuazon,
Temporally coordinated signals progressively pattern the anteroposterior and dorsoventral body axes.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Virgirinia,
Cdc2-like kinase 2 (Clk2) promotes early neural development in Xenopus embryos.
2019,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
WADDINGTON,
Studies on regional specificity within the organization centre of urodeles.
1950,
Pubmed
Wullimann,
Secondary neurogenesis in the brain of the African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis, as revealed by PCNA, Delta-1, Neurogenin-related-1, and NeuroD expression.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wymeersch,
Position-dependent plasticity of distinct progenitor types in the primitive streak.
2016,
Pubmed
Xue,
Mechanics-guided embryonic patterning of neuroectoderm tissue from human pluripotent stem cells.
2018,
Pubmed
Yao,
Epigenetic mechanisms in neurogenesis.
2016,
Pubmed
Yoo,
ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling in neural development.
2009,
Pubmed