Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
RAD51 bypasses the CMG helicase to promote replication fork reversal.
Liu W
,
Saito Y
,
Jackson J
,
Bhowmick R
,
Kanemaki MT
,
Vindigni A
,
Cortez D
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Replication fork reversal safeguards genome integrity as a replication stress response. DNA translocases and the RAD51 recombinase catalyze reversal. However, it remains unknown why RAD51 is required and what happens to the replication machinery during reversal. We find that RAD51 uses its strand exchange activity to circumvent the replicative helicase, which remains bound to the stalled fork. RAD51 is not required for fork reversal if the helicase is unloaded. Thus, we propose that RAD51 creates a parental DNA duplex behind the helicase that is used as a substrate by the DNA translocases for branch migration to create a reversed fork structure. Our data explain how fork reversal happens while maintaining the helicase in a position poised to restart DNA synthesis and complete genome duplication.
Ameziane,
A novel Fanconi anaemia subtype associated with a dominant-negative mutation in RAD51.
2015, Pubmed
Ameziane,
A novel Fanconi anaemia subtype associated with a dominant-negative mutation in RAD51.
2015,
Pubmed
Amunugama,
Replication Fork Reversal during DNA Interstrand Crosslink Repair Requires CMG Unloading.
2018,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Bai,
HLTF Promotes Fork Reversal, Limiting Replication Stress Resistance and Preventing Multiple Mechanisms of Unrestrained DNA Synthesis.
2020,
Pubmed
Berti,
The plasticity of DNA replication forks in response to clinically relevant genotoxic stress.
2020,
Pubmed
Bétous,
SMARCAL1 catalyzes fork regression and Holliday junction migration to maintain genome stability during DNA replication.
2012,
Pubmed
Bétous,
Substrate-selective repair and restart of replication forks by DNA translocases.
2013,
Pubmed
Bhat,
High-affinity DNA-binding domains of replication protein A (RPA) direct SMARCAL1-dependent replication fork remodeling.
2015,
Pubmed
Bhat,
RADX Modulates RAD51 Activity to Control Replication Fork Protection.
2018,
Pubmed
Bianchi,
Synapsis and the formation of paranemic joints by E. coli RecA protein.
1983,
Pubmed
Cabello-Lobato,
Physical interactions between MCM and Rad51 facilitate replication fork lesion bypass and ssDNA gap filling by non-recombinogenic functions.
2021,
Pubmed
Chen,
Tumor-associated mutations in a conserved structural motif alter physical and biochemical properties of human RAD51 recombinase.
2015,
Pubmed
Chi,
Roles of ATP binding and ATP hydrolysis in human Rad51 recombinase function.
2006,
Pubmed
Cloud,
Rad51 is an accessory factor for Dmc1-mediated joint molecule formation during meiosis.
2012,
Pubmed
Cortez,
Replication-Coupled DNA Repair.
2019,
Pubmed
Costa,
The Initiation of Eukaryotic DNA Replication.
2022,
Pubmed
Davies,
Interaction with the BRCA2 C terminus protects RAD51-DNA filaments from disassembly by BRC repeats.
2007,
Pubmed
Dungrawala,
Purification of proteins on newly synthesized DNA using iPOND.
2015,
Pubmed
Dungrawala,
The Replication Checkpoint Prevents Two Types of Fork Collapse without Regulating Replisome Stability.
2015,
Pubmed
Fortin,
Mutations in yeast Rad51 that partially bypass the requirement for Rad55 and Rad57 in DNA repair by increasing the stability of Rad51-DNA complexes.
2002,
Pubmed
Fugger,
FBH1 Catalyzes Regression of Stalled Replication Forks.
2015,
Pubmed
Gambus,
GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks.
2006,
Pubmed
Halder,
Strand annealing and motor driven activities of SMARCAL1 and ZRANB3 are stimulated by RAD51 and the paralog complex.
2022,
Pubmed
Hashimoto,
Rad51 protects nascent DNA from Mre11-dependent degradation and promotes continuous DNA synthesis.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Huang,
A unique binding mode enables MCM2 to chaperone histones H3-H4 at replication forks.
2015,
Pubmed
Jackson,
Studying Single-Stranded DNA Gaps at Replication Intermediates by Electron Microscopy.
2022,
Pubmed
Jenkyn-Bedford,
A conserved mechanism for regulating replisome disassembly in eukaryotes.
2021,
Pubmed
Kolinjivadi,
Smarcal1-Mediated Fork Reversal Triggers Mre11-Dependent Degradation of Nascent DNA in the Absence of Brca2 and Stable Rad51 Nucleofilaments.
2017,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Krishnamoorthy,
RADX prevents genome instability by confining replication fork reversal to stalled forks.
2021,
Pubmed
Leuzzi,
WRNIP1 protects stalled forks from degradation and promotes fork restart after replication stress.
2016,
Pubmed
Liang,
Promotion of RAD51-Mediated Homologous DNA Pairing by the RAD51AP1-UAF1 Complex.
2016,
Pubmed
Liu,
Two replication fork remodeling pathways generate nuclease substrates for distinct fork protection factors.
2020,
Pubmed
Lossaint,
FANCD2 binds MCM proteins and controls replisome function upon activation of s phase checkpoint signaling.
2013,
Pubmed
Malik,
Rad51 gain-of-function mutants that exhibit high affinity DNA binding cause DNA damage sensitivity in the absence of Srs2.
2008,
Pubmed
Maric,
Cdc48 and a ubiquitin ligase drive disassembly of the CMG helicase at the end of DNA replication.
2014,
Pubmed
Marie,
Mechanism for inverted-repeat recombination induced by a replication fork barrier.
2022,
Pubmed
Marsden,
The Tumor-Associated Variant RAD51 G151D Induces a Hyper-Recombination Phenotype.
2016,
Pubmed
Mason,
A structure-specific nucleic acid-binding domain conserved among DNA repair proteins.
2014,
Pubmed
Mason,
Non-enzymatic roles of human RAD51 at stalled replication forks.
2019,
Pubmed
Matsuo,
Roles of the human Rad51 L1 and L2 loops in DNA binding.
2006,
Pubmed
Mehta,
CHK1 phosphorylates PRIMPOL to promote replication stress tolerance.
2022,
Pubmed
Michaels,
Precise tuning of gene expression levels in mammalian cells.
2019,
Pubmed
Mijic,
Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells.
2017,
Pubmed
Moreno,
Polyubiquitylation drives replisome disassembly at the termination of DNA replication.
2014,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Morrison,
The essential functions of human Rad51 are independent of ATP hydrolysis.
1999,
Pubmed
Prakash,
Distinct pathways of homologous recombination controlled by the SWS1-SWSAP1-SPIDR complex.
2021,
Pubmed
Prasad,
Visualizing the assembly of human Rad51 filaments on double-stranded DNA.
2006,
Pubmed
Quinet,
PRIMPOL-Mediated Adaptive Response Suppresses Replication Fork Reversal in BRCA-Deficient Cells.
2020,
Pubmed
Saito,
Targeted Protein Depletion Using the Auxin-Inducible Degron 2 (AID2) System.
2021,
Pubmed
Schlacher,
A distinct replication fork protection pathway connects Fanconi anemia tumor suppressors to RAD51-BRCA1/2.
2012,
Pubmed
Schlacher,
Double-strand break repair-independent role for BRCA2 in blocking stalled replication fork degradation by MRE11.
2011,
Pubmed
Sigurdsson,
Homologous DNA pairing by human recombination factors Rad51 and Rad54.
2002,
Pubmed
Stark,
ATP hydrolysis by mammalian RAD51 has a key role during homology-directed DNA repair.
2002,
Pubmed
Taglialatela,
Restoration of Replication Fork Stability in BRCA1- and BRCA2-Deficient Cells by Inactivation of SNF2-Family Fork Remodelers.
2017,
Pubmed
Thangavel,
DNA2 drives processing and restart of reversed replication forks in human cells.
2015,
Pubmed
Vujanovic,
Replication Fork Slowing and Reversal upon DNA Damage Require PCNA Polyubiquitination and ZRANB3 DNA Translocase Activity.
2017,
Pubmed
Wang,
A Dominant Mutation in Human RAD51 Reveals Its Function in DNA Interstrand Crosslink Repair Independent of Homologous Recombination.
2015,
Pubmed
Wasserman,
Replication Fork Activation Is Enabled by a Single-Stranded DNA Gate in CMG Helicase.
2019,
Pubmed
Yesbolatova,
The auxin-inducible degron 2 technology provides sharp degradation control in yeast, mammalian cells, and mice.
2020,
Pubmed
Zadorozhny,
Fanconi-Anemia-Associated Mutations Destabilize RAD51 Filaments and Impair Replication Fork Protection.
2017,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Zellweger,
Rad51-mediated replication fork reversal is a global response to genotoxic treatments in human cells.
2015,
Pubmed